Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle
Comparison: Continental Conti Hybrid Ld3 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Continental allround tyres are slightly better rated (74%) than Kumho (65%). When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Continental Conti Hybrid Ld3 has C wet grip rating, whereas 95% of Kumho WinterCraft WP52 has B rating.
| # | Continental Conti Hybrid Ld3
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R18 | R0 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient
