• 18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Continental AllSeasonContact vs. Firestone Multiseason 2 vs. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

In this text comparison, we will look into two well-known tyres in the market - the Continental AllSeasonContact and the Firestone Multiseason 2. The former is an all-round tyre known for its excellent performance on various terrains, while the latter is a winter tyre designed for optimal grip and stability in cold and icy conditions. Both tyres have been extensively tested and reviewed; let's dive into the strengths, weaknesses, and test results for each.


Starting with the Continental AllSeasonContact, it has an impressive rating of 90% on our website. Manufactured in Slovakia, Czech Republic, and France, it has no predecessor or successor models. According to tests conducted by Autoklub ČR, it secured 2nd position out of 10 tyres, excelling in aquaplaning, dry handling, comfort, and wet circle cornering. In Autobild tests, the tyre ranked 8th out of 32 and shone in snow braking, snow cornering, wet circle cornering, and comfort. Test summary from autobild 2020 praised its all-around performance, excellent winter qualities, and very good price-to-quality ratio.


On the other hand, the Firestone Multiseason 2 has a rating of 79% on our website. Manufactured in Italy, this tyre also has no predecessor or successor models. In Autoklub ČR tests, it secured the 6th position, while in Autobild tests, it ranked even higher at position 6 out of 32 tyres. The Firestone Multiseason 2 excels in price-to-value, snow traction, short wet and snow braking distances, with a high-mileage capacity and low rolling resistance, as per the autobild 2022 test summary.


However, both tyres have some weaknesses as well. The Continental AllSeasonContact was criticized for understeering and long braking distances on dry surfaces, limited mileage, and economy in the autobild 2022 test summary. Meanwhile, the Firestone Multiseason 2 had lower safety reserves for curve aquaplaning and extended dry braking distances.


In conclusion, both the Continental AllSeasonContact and Firestone Multiseason 2 have their strengths and weaknesses. Overall, the Continental AllSeasonContact seems to perform better in tests and offers great all-around performance, while the Firestone Multiseason 2 offers excellent price-to-quality ratio and better performance in some winter conditions. Therefore, the choice between these two largely depends on the specific requirements and preferences of the driver. Be sure to visit the manufacturer websites for Continental and Firestone to gain more insight and make an informed decision.

Performance comparison

Averaged from 4 tests

Wet Performance
Continental AllSeasonContact
78%
Continental
AllSeasonContact
Firestone Multiseason 2
64%
Firestone
Multiseason 2
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
82%
GoodYear
Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
Wet Braking
Continental AllSeasonContact
78%
Firestone Multiseason 2
74%
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
84%
Wet Handling
Continental AllSeasonContact
64%
Firestone Multiseason 2
60%
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
73%
Wet Circle Cornering
Continental AllSeasonContact
86%
Firestone Multiseason 2
78%
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
81%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Continental AllSeasonContact
82%
Firestone Multiseason 2
63%
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
87%
Aquaplaning Cross
Continental AllSeasonContact
81%
Firestone Multiseason 2
46%
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
85%
Best: Toyo Celsius AS2 (96.0%)
Best in category: Vredestein Quatrac 5 (93.6%)
Dry Performance
Continental AllSeasonContact
72%
Continental
AllSeasonContact
Firestone Multiseason 2
73%
Firestone
Multiseason 2
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
78%
GoodYear
Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
Dry Braking
Continental AllSeasonContact
64%
Firestone Multiseason 2
69%
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
72%
Dry Handling
Continental AllSeasonContact
79%
Firestone Multiseason 2
76%
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
83%
Best in category: Michelin CrossClimate 2 (91.7%)
Snow Performance
Continental AllSeasonContact
90%
Continental
AllSeasonContact
Firestone Multiseason 2
78%
Firestone
Multiseason 2
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
86%
GoodYear
Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
Snow Braking
Continental AllSeasonContact
91%
Firestone Multiseason 2
87%
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
87%
Best: Debica Navigator 3 (100.0%)
Snow Traction
Continental AllSeasonContact
87%
Firestone Multiseason 2
86%
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
87%
Best: Debica Navigator 3 (99.0%)
Snow Handling
Continental AllSeasonContact
88%
Firestone Multiseason 2
79%
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
87%
Best: Debica Navigator 3 (100.0%)
Snow Circle Cornering
Continental AllSeasonContact
95%
Firestone Multiseason 2
61%
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
81%
Best: Kleber Quadraxer 2 (96.0%)
Best in category: Debica Navigator 3 (99.7%)
Comfort & Noise
Continental AllSeasonContact
79%
Continental
AllSeasonContact
Firestone Multiseason 2
73%
Firestone
Multiseason 2
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
83%
GoodYear
Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
Noise Exterior
Continental AllSeasonContact
78%
Firestone Multiseason 2
76%
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
84%
Best: Debica Navigator 3 (98.0%)
Ride Comfort
Continental AllSeasonContact
80%
Firestone Multiseason 2
70%
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
81%
Best: Kleber Quadraxer 3 (91.0%)
Best in category: Vredestein Quatrac Pro (86.0%)
Economy
Continental AllSeasonContact
71%
Continental
AllSeasonContact
Firestone Multiseason 2
76%
Firestone
Multiseason 2
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
91%
GoodYear
Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
Rolling Resistance
Continental AllSeasonContact
77%
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
89%
Best: Viking Fourtech (96.0%)
Mileage
Continental AllSeasonContact
65%
Firestone Multiseason 2
81%
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
93%
Best: Vredestein Quatrac 5 (100.0%)
Best in category: Michelin CrossClimate+ (94.0%)

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Loading...

Add to comparison