Segment
1. Firestone Multiseason 2 Upper-middle2. Laufenn G Fit 4S Lowcost
Comparison: Ceat 4 SeasonDrive vs. Laufenn G Fit 4S vs. Firestone Multiseason 2
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Laufenn G Fit 4S 14.8
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Laufenn G Fit 4S Good3. Ceat 4 SeasonDrive Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
2. Laufenn G Fit 4S Good3. Ceat 4 SeasonDrive Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 38.0 | 43.9 | |||||
| Ceat 4 SeasonDrive | 38.6 | 47.4 | |||||
| Laufenn G Fit 4S | 42.1 | 45.8 | |||||
| Firestone Multiseason 2 | 41.5 | 50.3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,9 | 44,4 | |||||
| Ceat 4 SeasonDrive | 44,9 | 63,7 | |||||
| Laufenn G Fit 4S | 45,2 | 53,9 | |||||
| Firestone Multiseason 2 | 45,9 | 48,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
