Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium2. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Premium3. Vredestein ULTRAC Premium4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle
Comparison: Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs. Vredestein ULTRAC
The following is a comparison of two summer touring tyres: Bridgestone Turanza T005 and Kumho Ecsta HS52. These tyres have been subject to various tests to determine their performance under different conditions.
Bridgestone Turanza T005
Manufactured in Hungary, Poland, France, and Italy by Bridgestone, the Turanza T005 is a high-performing tyre with an 89% rating on our scale. The T005 has consistently showcased strong performance in testing. Most notably, it claimed the top position in the Autobild test, dominated by its dry and wet braking, and wet handling capabilities. Additionally, it placed third and fourth in the Autoklub ČR and ADAC tests respectively, recognized for its impressive rolling resistance and wet cornering performance.
Bridgestone Turanza T005's noted strengths include a balanced drive on both dry and wet roads, high efficiency and a decent environmental footprint. However, the tyre's performance is slightly hindered by its reduced mileage.
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Developed by Kumho as a successor to the Ecsta HS51, the Ecsta HS52 has earned an 81% rating on our scale. Although it has not outperformed the Turanza T005 in any of the mentioned tests, it was placed third in Autobild test, excelling in areas such as dry braking and price-value offering. It also achieved the eighth position in the ADAC test.
The Kumho Ecsta HS52’s strengths lie in its balanced performance on both dry and wet roads, short dry and wet braking distances, comfort, and good price-to-performance ratio. On the downside, it was criticized for its delayed steering response and environmental impact, and lower efficiency and sustainability when compared with the Bridgestone Turanza T005.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the test results, the Bridgestone Turanza T005 appears to be the stronger performer overall. Although the Kumho Ecsta HS52 has commendable qualities and a good price-to-performance ratio, it lags behind in efficiency, environmental impact, and steering response. It's imperative to choose a tyre model that best suits your driving style and conditions.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.674. Vredestein ULTRAC 7.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Exemplary2. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Exemplary3. Vredestein ULTRAC Highly recommended4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good4. Vredestein ULTRAC Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 5 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
5
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 104,7 | 106 | 103,4 | ||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 | 102,4 | 101,3 | 103,4 | ||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 96,9 | 94,3 | 99,5 | ||||
| Vredestein Ultrac | 101,3 | 103,3 | 99,2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | ||||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Highly recommended | 1 | ||||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Recommended | 1 | ||||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Rating: Recommended | 1 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Good | 2,4 | 2,2 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Good | 2,7 | 2,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1+ | ||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Good | 1 | 2+ | 2- | ||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Rating: Satisfactory | 1- | 2 | 3 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 | 35,8 | 27,5 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 35,7 | 28,6 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac | 36,1 | 28,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
