Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo Premium3. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium4. Esa-Tecar Spirit 5 HP Lowcost5. Fulda EcoControl HP Lowcost
Comparison: Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo vs. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 vs. Esa-Tecar Spirit 5 HP vs. Fulda EcoControl HP
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Exemplary2. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Exemplary5. Fulda EcoControl HP Recommended
Worst rating in test
3. Fulda EcoControl HP Recommended4. Esa-Tecar Spirit 5 HP Satisfactory5. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,6 | 3,0 | 1,0 | 1,7 | ||
| Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo Rating: Good | 2,0 | 1,9 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 2,1 | ||
| Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Rating: Good | 2,2 | 2,2 | 3,3 | 2,5 | 1,7 | ||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Good | 2,5 | 1,6 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 2,1 | ||
| Esa-Tecar Spirit 5 HP Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 2,1 | 3,7 | 2,5 | 2,0 | ||
| Fulda EcoControl HP Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 2,6 | 3,4 | 1,5 | 2,2 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
