Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo Premium3. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium4. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle5. Semperit Speed-Life 2 Lowcost6. Esa-Tecar Spirit 5 HP Lowcost
Comparison: Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo vs. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 vs. Semperit Speed-Life 2 vs. Esa-Tecar Spirit 5 HP
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
6. Semperit Speed-Life 2 13.71
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Exemplary2. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary3. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Exemplary6. Semperit Speed-Life 2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
3. Esa-Tecar Spirit 5 HP Satisfactory4. Semperit Speed-Life 2 Satisfactory5. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Conditionally recommended6. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,6 | 3,0 | 1,0 | 1,7 | ||
| Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo Rating: Good | 2,0 | 1,9 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 2,1 | ||
| Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Rating: Good | 2,2 | 2,2 | 3,3 | 2,5 | 1,7 | ||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Good | 2,2 | 1,7 | 3,7 | 2,5 | 2,2 | ||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Good | 2,5 | 1,6 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 2,1 | ||
| Semperit Speed-Life 2 Rating: Good | 2,1 | 2,4 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 2,2 | ||
| Esa-Tecar Spirit 5 HP Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 2,1 | 3,7 | 2,5 | 2,0 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
