Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo Premium
Comparison: Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo vs. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (86%) than Continental (84%). But when it comes to comparing Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo and Continental ContiPremiumContact 5, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo was done in 2017, compared to 2016 when was the Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2018 205/55 R16 test, where both the Turanza T001 Evo and the ContiPremiumContact 5 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (50%) of the Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo
| Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R15 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,6 | 3,0 | 1,0 | 1,7 | ||
| Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo Rating: Good | 2,0 | 1,9 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 2,1 | ||
| Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Rating: Good | 2,2 | 2,2 | 3,3 | 2,5 | 1,7 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
