Comparison: Bridgestone Potenza Sport vs. Falken Azenis FK520

Let's take a look at two summer tyres: one is the Bridgestone Potenza Sport from Bridgestone, the other is the Falken Azenis FK520 from Falken. The Bridgestone tyre was made in PL and HU while the Falken was produced in TR.

In comparison, Bridgestone Potenza Sport holds a higher overall rating (87%) versus Falken Azenis FK520 (72%). When it comes to placement in various tyre tests, the Bridgestone tyre consistently outperforms its Falken counterpart. Notably, the tests by Autozeitung, ADAC and Gute-Fahrt website rank Bridgestone in higher positions.

Bridgestone's key strengths include excellent dry handling and good wet handling, as well as a higher projected lifespan and lower wear. However, its drawbacks are a heavier weight and higher fuel consumption (source).

On the other hand, Falken Azenis FK520 shows good performance on both dry and wet roads, and it also offers high mileage and low wear. It has a lower fuel consumption compared to Bridgestone but reveals some weaknesses in dry road comfort, aquaplaning behaviour, and wet handling (source).

As for the best features, tests highlight Bridgestone's wet handling and Falken's performance in longitudinal aquaplaning. Furthermore, Bridgestone was superior in wet braking, wet safety, dry handling, and safety, while Falken's strengths were comfort and exterior noise (source, source).

In summary, if you prefer a higher-rated tyre with strong performance on wet and dry roads and don't mind a slightly higher fuel consumption, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport could be a better choice for you. However, if fuel efficiency and comfort are of greater importance to you, the Falken Azenis FK520 can be a solid alternative. Keep in mind that neither tyre has been replaced by a newer model yet..