• 12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Bridgestone Potenza S001 vs. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti

When comparing two summer tyres, the Bridgestone Potenza S001 and the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti, we need to pay close attention to their performances across multiple tyre tests.


In the comparison conducted by AutoBild, out of 50 tyres tested, the Bridgestone Potenza S001 claimed the 3rd position while the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti managed the 8th place. Notably, the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti excelled in several features including Aquaplaning - cross, Wet braking, Wet handling, and Wet side guide.


However, in the ADAC tests, out of 16 tyres tested, the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti secured a position above Bridgestone Potenza S001. The Vredestein Ultrac Vorti bagged the 7th position showing strengths in mileage and Exterior noise, while the Bridgestone Potenza S001 fell a few spots behind at 9th but also stood out in the feature of Aquaplaning - cross.


Delving into the details of the individual tyres, Bridgestone Potenza S001 produced by Bridgestone is a summer tyre that offers a good balance of wet and dry performance. The tyre doesn't have any previous models or newer models to compare to, but it has been recognized for its exceptional feature in resisting Aquaplaning - which is crucial during heavy summer rains.


On the other hand, the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti, manufactured in the Netherlands by Vredestein, also doesn't have any previous models or newer models for direct comparison. However, this tyre has exhibited strength in an array of wet condition features such as Aquaplaning - cross, Wet braking, Wet handling, and Wet side guide. In addition, it showed impressive mileage and tolerable Exterior noise according to ADAC tests.


In summary, while the Bridgestone Potenza S001 appears to lead in the AutoBild tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti outperforms in the ADAC tests and exhibits a broader array of strong features. Thus, the choice between the two ultimately depends on the specific preferences and driving conditions of the user.

Performance comparison

Averaged from 2 tests

Wet Performance
Bridgestone Potenza S001
66%
Bridgestone
Potenza S001
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
80%
Vredestein
Ultrac Vorti
Wet Braking
Bridgestone Potenza S001
64%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
87%
Wet Handling
Bridgestone Potenza S001
46%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
78%
Best: Pirelli P Zero (100.0%)
Wet Circle Cornering
Bridgestone Potenza S001
58%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
80%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Bridgestone Potenza S001
78%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
70%
Best: Kumho Ecsta PS71 (89.0%)
Aquaplaning Cross
Bridgestone Potenza S001
83%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
84%
Best: Firestone Roadhawk (88.0%)
Best in category: Pirelli P Zero (85.0%)
Dry Performance
Bridgestone Potenza S001
92%
Bridgestone
Potenza S001
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
79%
Vredestein
Ultrac Vorti
Dry Braking
Bridgestone Potenza S001
92%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
86%
Dry Handling
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
71%
Best in category: Pirelli P Zero (97.0%)
Comfort & Noise
Bridgestone Potenza S001
64%
Bridgestone
Potenza S001
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
68%
Vredestein
Ultrac Vorti
Noise Exterior
Bridgestone Potenza S001
70%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
75%
Noise Interior
Bridgestone Potenza S001
58%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
69%
Best: Nokian Powerproof (80.0%)
Ride Comfort
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
61%
Best in category: Fulda SportControl 2 (88.0%)
Economy
Bridgestone Potenza S001
80%
Bridgestone
Potenza S001
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
65%
Vredestein
Ultrac Vorti
Rolling Resistance
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
46%
Best: Apollo Aspire XP (96.0%)
Fuel Efficiency
Bridgestone Potenza S001
82%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
76%
Best: Sava Intensa uhp 2 (93.0%)
Mileage
Bridgestone Potenza S001
78%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
73%
Best in category: Sava Intensa uhp 2 (91.0%)

Performance spider chart

Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Loading...

Add to comparison