• 12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Bridgestone Potenza S001 vs. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

The Bridgestone Potenza S001 and the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 are two high-performance tyres that users often compare. Both are designed as summer tyres suitable for high-speed driving, offering excellent handling and traction.


In the tyre test comparisons, the Bridgestone Potenza S001 consistently performed well, ranking 3rd out of 50 tyres in Autobild's testing, and 9th out of 16 tyres on ADAC's leaderboard. This tyre excels at cross aquaplaning, highlighting its impressive wet grip capabilities. However, it's worth noting that our website rating for this tyre is currently not determined. The Potenza S001 is still available, as Bridgestone hasn't released a newer tyre model to replace it.


On the other hand, the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 occupies comparable positions in the tests, securing 6th place in Autobild and an impressive 3rd place in ADAC. It also scored an excellent rating of 80% on our website. These results underline its strengths in wet handling and value for money, making it a great balance of performance and cost-efficiency, while its best-rated feature is mileage. This tyre, produced in Slovenia and Germany by Goodyear, is a replacement for the earlier Asymmetric 3 model, and has been superseded by the Asymmetric 6 model.


Overall, according to the comparison data from all tests, the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 seems to offer a better balance between price and performance than the Bridgestone Potenza S001, with a noticeable advantage in tyre life. However, in a high-speed, wet-grip situation, the Bridgestone Potenza S001 might be a more optimal choice. These results can help drivers make an informed decision based on their individual needs and preferences.

Performance comparison

Averaged from 2 tests

Wet Performance
Bridgestone Potenza S001
66%
Bridgestone
Potenza S001
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
76%
GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Wet Braking
Bridgestone Potenza S001
64%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
79%
Wet Handling
Bridgestone Potenza S001
46%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
88%
Best: Pirelli P Zero (100.0%)
Wet Circle Cornering
Bridgestone Potenza S001
58%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
69%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Bridgestone Potenza S001
78%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
66%
Best: Kumho Ecsta PS71 (89.0%)
Aquaplaning Cross
Bridgestone Potenza S001
83%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
76%
Best: Firestone Roadhawk (88.0%)
Best in category: Pirelli P Zero (85.0%)
Dry Performance
Bridgestone Potenza S001
92%
Bridgestone
Potenza S001
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
85%
GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Dry Braking
Bridgestone Potenza S001
92%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
91%
Dry Handling
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
79%
Best in category: Pirelli P Zero (97.0%)
Comfort & Noise
Bridgestone Potenza S001
64%
Bridgestone
Potenza S001
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
72%
GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Noise Exterior
Bridgestone Potenza S001
70%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
75%
Noise Interior
Bridgestone Potenza S001
58%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
69%
Best: Nokian Powerproof (80.0%)
Ride Comfort
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
71%
Best in category: Fulda SportControl 2 (88.0%)
Economy
Bridgestone Potenza S001
80%
Bridgestone
Potenza S001
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
89%
GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Rolling Resistance
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
88%
Best: Apollo Aspire XP (96.0%)
Fuel Efficiency
Bridgestone Potenza S001
82%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
87%
Best: Sava Intensa uhp 2 (93.0%)
Mileage
Bridgestone Potenza S001
78%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
91%
Best in category: Sava Intensa uhp 2 (91.0%)

Performance spider chart

Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Loading...

Add to comparison