Segment
1. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Premium
# | Bridgestone Potenza S001
| GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R17 - R20 | R17 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
The Bridgestone Potenza S001 and the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 are two high-performance tyres that users often compare. Both are designed as summer tyres suitable for high-speed driving, offering excellent handling and traction.
In the tyre test comparisons, the Bridgestone Potenza S001 consistently performed well, ranking 3rd out of 50 tyres in Autobild's testing, and 9th out of 16 tyres on ADAC's leaderboard. This tyre excels at cross aquaplaning, highlighting its impressive wet grip capabilities. However, it's worth noting that our website rating for this tyre is currently not determined. The Potenza S001 is still available, as Bridgestone hasn't released a newer tyre model to replace it.
On the other hand, the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 occupies comparable positions in the tests, securing 6th place in Autobild and an impressive 3rd place in ADAC. It also scored an excellent rating of 80% on our website. These results underline its strengths in wet handling and value for money, making it a great balance of performance and cost-efficiency, while its best-rated feature is mileage. This tyre, produced in Slovenia and Germany by Goodyear, is a replacement for the earlier Asymmetric 3 model, and has been superseded by the Asymmetric 6 model.
Overall, according to the comparison data from all tests, the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 seems to offer a better balance between price and performance than the Bridgestone Potenza S001, with a noticeable advantage in tyre life. However, in a high-speed, wet-grip situation, the Bridgestone Potenza S001 might be a more optimal choice. These results can help drivers make an informed decision based on their individual needs and preferences.
1. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Premium
1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Exemplary2. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Satisfactory
2. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Conditionally recommended
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | příkladné | 1 | 1- | 1 | |||
Bridgestone Potenza S001 Rating: Good | dobré | 1 | 2+ | 3+ | |||
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 1- | 2+ | 1 | |||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
Bridgestone Potenza S001 | 33,5 | 28,7 | |||||
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | 33,2 | 30,8 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | dobré | 1,7 | 1,3 | 2,8 | 2,0 | 1,6 | |
Bridgestone Potenza S001 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3,0 | 1,7 | 3,5 | 2,5 | 2,1 | |
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Rating: Good | dobré | 2,3 | 1,7 | 3,1 | 2,0 | 1,9 | |
Show test details |