• 12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Bridgestone Potenza S001 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 vs. Nexen N fera Sport


The Bridgestone Potenza S001 and the Continental PremiumContact 6 are both high-quality summer tyres, although there are some significant characteristics that set them apart based on various test results. These tests provide a clear view regarding their respective strengths and weaknesses, contributing to the overall verdict of each tyre.


The Bridgestone Potenza S001 showed decent performance in tests carried out by Autobild and ADAC. In a mutual test of 50 tyres by Autobild, it held a respectable 3rd position, outshining the Continental PremiumContact 6 which was right behind in the 4th position. Its strength was particularly seen in 'aquaplaning - cross', further demonstrating its high grip and stability in challenging wet conditions.


However, the Bridgestone Potenza S001 tyre has been outperformed by its competitor, the Continental PremiumContact 6, in several aspects. The PremiumContact 6 not only excelled in dry handling, mileage, and price/value, but also dominated in a mutual test by ADAC, taking the top spot among 16 tyres tested. This tyre was also highlighted for its excellent wet braking, wet circle cornering, and wet handling, showcasing its superior performance under wet conditions.


Continental has gone a step ahead, with the Continental PremiumContact 6 now having been replaced by a newer model, the Continental PremiumContact 7, offering better performance and characteristics. On the other hand, the Bridgestone Potenza S001 still remains as an active model from Bridgestone.


When summing up the test results and customer feedback, it's clear that the Continental PremiumContact 6 offers a more balanced performance in various conditions and outperforms the Bridgestone Potenza S001 in several key aspects. Still, both tyres provide reliable performance and are esteemed products from their respective Continental and Bridgestone manufacturers.

Performance comparison

Averaged from 2 tests

Wet Performance
Bridgestone Potenza S001
66%
Bridgestone
Potenza S001
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Continental
PremiumContact 6
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
76%
GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Nexen N fera Sport
78%
Nexen
N fera Sport
Wet Braking
Bridgestone Potenza S001
64%
Continental PremiumContact 6
89%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
79%
Nexen N fera Sport
92%
Wet Handling
Bridgestone Potenza S001
46%
Continental PremiumContact 6
94%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
88%
Nexen N fera Sport
73%
Best: Pirelli P Zero (100.0%)
Wet Circle Cornering
Bridgestone Potenza S001
58%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
69%
Nexen N fera Sport
69%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Bridgestone Potenza S001
78%
Continental PremiumContact 6
71%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
66%
Nexen N fera Sport
85%
Best: Kumho Ecsta PS71 (89.0%)
Aquaplaning Cross
Bridgestone Potenza S001
83%
Continental PremiumContact 6
76%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
76%
Nexen N fera Sport
70%
Best: Firestone Roadhawk (88.0%)
Best in category: Pirelli P Zero (85.0%)
Dry Performance
Bridgestone Potenza S001
92%
Bridgestone
Potenza S001
Continental PremiumContact 6
94%
Continental
PremiumContact 6
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
85%
GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Nexen N fera Sport
68%
Nexen
N fera Sport
Dry Braking
Bridgestone Potenza S001
92%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
91%
Nexen N fera Sport
81%
Dry Handling
Continental PremiumContact 6
96%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
79%
Nexen N fera Sport
55%
Best in category: Pirelli P Zero (97.0%)
Comfort & Noise
Bridgestone Potenza S001
64%
Bridgestone
Potenza S001
Continental PremiumContact 6
67%
Continental
PremiumContact 6
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
72%
GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Nexen N fera Sport
68%
Nexen
N fera Sport
Noise Exterior
Bridgestone Potenza S001
70%
Continental PremiumContact 6
60%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
75%
Nexen N fera Sport
79%
Noise Interior
Bridgestone Potenza S001
58%
Continental PremiumContact 6
69%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
69%
Nexen N fera Sport
64%
Best: Nokian Powerproof (80.0%)
Ride Comfort
Continental PremiumContact 6
71%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
71%
Nexen N fera Sport
61%
Best in category: Fulda SportControl 2 (88.0%)
Economy
Bridgestone Potenza S001
80%
Bridgestone
Potenza S001
Continental PremiumContact 6
88%
Continental
PremiumContact 6
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
89%
GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Nexen N fera Sport
68%
Nexen
N fera Sport
Rolling Resistance
Continental PremiumContact 6
88%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
88%
Nexen N fera Sport
55%
Best: Apollo Aspire XP (96.0%)
Fuel Efficiency
Bridgestone Potenza S001
82%
Continental PremiumContact 6
82%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
87%
Nexen N fera Sport
87%
Best: Sava Intensa uhp 2 (93.0%)
Mileage
Bridgestone Potenza S001
78%
Continental PremiumContact 6
95%
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
91%
Nexen N fera Sport
62%
Best in category: Sava Intensa uhp 2 (91.0%)

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Loading...

Add to comparison