18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Laufenn I FIT Plus vs. Viking WinTech

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 /82%	Laufenn I FIT Plus /59%	Viking WinTech /53%

Dimensions	R14 - R22		R13 - R20
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium

2. Laufenn I FIT Plus Lowcost

3. Viking WinTech Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

2. Viking WinTech 53

3. Laufenn I FIT Plus 0

Number of tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 49x

2. Laufenn I FIT Plus 6x

3. Viking WinTech 6x

Best position in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 1.

2. Laufenn I FIT Plus 10.

3. Viking WinTech 11.

Worst position in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 15.

2. Laufenn I FIT Plus 20.

3. Viking WinTech 41.

Average position in tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 3.2

2. Laufenn I FIT Plus 14.5

3. Viking WinTech 20.83

Year of the last test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2024

2. Viking WinTech 2024

3. Laufenn I FIT Plus 2023

Best rating in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good

2. Viking WinTech Recommended

3. Laufenn I FIT Plus Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Laufenn I FIT Plus Conditionally recommended

2. Viking WinTech Conditionally recommended

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended

Snow

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

85%

Laufenn
I FIT Plus

80%

Viking
WinTech

69%

Snow braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 78%

2. Laufenn I FIT Plus 74%

3. Viking WinTech 66%

Snow traction

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 85%

2. Viking WinTech 76%

3. Laufenn I FIT Plus 76%

Snow handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 94%

2. Laufenn I FIT Plus 86%

3. Viking WinTech 0%

Snow cornering

1. Laufenn I FIT Plus 84%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

3. Viking WinTech 65%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

77%

Laufenn
I FIT Plus

71%

Viking
WinTech

68%

Dry braking

1. Laufenn I FIT Plus 75%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 70%

3. Viking WinTech 57%

Dry handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 85%

2. Viking WinTech 78%

3. Laufenn I FIT Plus 67%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

88%

Laufenn
I FIT Plus

58%

Viking
WinTech

54%

Wet braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 97%

2. Viking WinTech 59%

3. Laufenn I FIT Plus 59%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

2. Laufenn I FIT Plus 60%

3. Viking WinTech 51%

Wet handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

2. Laufenn I FIT Plus 60%

3. Viking WinTech 53%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

2. Laufenn I FIT Plus 51%

3. Viking WinTech 42%

Wet circle cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

2. Viking WinTech 63%

3. Laufenn I FIT Plus 59%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 A

2. Viking WinTech ?

3. Laufenn I FIT Plus ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

74%

Laufenn
I FIT Plus

73%

Viking
WinTech

67%

Exterior noise

1. Laufenn I FIT Plus 80%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 77%

3. Viking WinTech 73%

Comfort

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 76%

2. Laufenn I FIT Plus 71%

3. Viking WinTech 0%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

2. Laufenn I FIT Plus ?

3. Viking WinTech ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Laufenn
I FIT Plus

72%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

66%

Viking
WinTech

61%

Rolling resistance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

2. Laufenn I FIT Plus 66%

3. Viking WinTech 0%

Mileage

1. Laufenn I FIT Plus 64%

2. Viking WinTech 61%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 60%

Price/value

1. Laufenn I FIT Plus 86%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 61%

3. Viking WinTech 0%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 C

2. Laufenn I FIT Plus ?

3. Viking WinTech ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Viking
WinTech

84%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

80.7%

Laufenn
I FIT Plus

0%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 6 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2023 225/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory	1-	2	2-	3+
Laufenn I FIT Plus Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	2+	2-
Viking WinTech Rating: Conditionally recommended	3+	2-	2	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2023 225/45 R18

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	31,4	29,2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	31,4	30,9
Laufenn I FIT Plus	35,1	30,6
Viking WinTech	36,0	31,0
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Wear
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+	1
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	1-	2	1	2	2+
Laufenn I FIT Plus Rating: Conditionally recommended	3+	2+	1-	2	3+
Show test details