12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Falken EuroWinter HS01 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Kleber KRISALP HP3

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 /82%	Falken EuroWinter HS01 /0%	GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ /90%	Kleber KRISALP HP3 /77%

Dimensions	R14 - R22	R13 - R21	R15 - R22	R14 - R20
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Premium

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Upper-middle

4. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 359

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 176

4. Kleber KRISALP HP3 113

Number of tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 49x

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 28x

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 23x

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 23x

Best position in test

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 1.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 1.

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 2.

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 5.

Worst position in test

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 8.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 15.

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 16.

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 30.

Average position in tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 3.2

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 3.26

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 8.04

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 11.04

Year of the last test

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 2025

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2024

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 2023

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 2022

Best rating in test

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Exemplary

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Very good

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Good

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Recommended

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Sufficient

Snow

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+

88%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

83%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

82%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

71%

Snow braking

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 88%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 88%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 87%

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 77%

Snow traction

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 87%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 81%

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 66%

Snow handling

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 89%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 87%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 80%

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 72%

Snow cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 87%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 85%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 78%

4. Kleber KRISALP HP3 75%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

83%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+

75%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

73%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

72%

Dry braking

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 82%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 78%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 78%

4. Kleber KRISALP HP3 76%

Dry handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 88%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 75%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 73%

4. Kleber KRISALP HP3 69%

Dry steering response

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 85%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 73%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 70%

4. Kleber KRISALP HP3 0%

Dry lane changing

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 80%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 75%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 65%

4. Kleber KRISALP HP3 0%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

91%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

72%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

71%

Wet braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 94%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 75%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 75%

4. Kleber KRISALP HP3 59%

Wet handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 93%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 82%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 72%

4. Kleber KRISALP HP3 70%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 87%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 88%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 82%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 92%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 79%

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 79%

Wet circle cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 88%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 78%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 66%

4. Kleber KRISALP HP3 60%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 A

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ B

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 B

4. Kleber KRISALP HP3 ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+

85%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

80%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

78%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

78%

Exterior noise

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 80%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 77%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 76%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 75%

Comfort

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 84%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 82%

4. Kleber KRISALP HP3 80%

Interior noise

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 95%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 81%

4. Kleber KRISALP HP3 0%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 72 dB

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 ?

4. Kleber KRISALP HP3 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+

74%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

71%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

69%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

68%

Rolling resistance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 80%

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 65%

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 51%

Mileage

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 77%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 73%

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 68%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 60%

Price/value

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 72%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 72%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 69%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 54%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ C

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 C

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 D

4. Kleber KRISALP HP3 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+

84.3%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

80%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

79%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

77.7%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 18 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,8	25,4
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	32,8	26,3
Falken EuroWinter HS01	36,3	25,9
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+	35,5	25,5
Kleber KRISALP HP3	37,3	25,5
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	2+	2+
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	1-	2+	2	3+
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Good	2-	2-	2	2
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Exemplary	2	2	1-	2
Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Good	2-	2-	1-	2-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 245/40 R19

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	2+	2+	2+
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2	2+
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Good	2	2	2
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2022 215/60 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Rolling resistance	Noise	Wear
Best values in test	2,0	1,8	1,4	1,8	1,5	2,7	1,5
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory	2,0	1,8	2,7	2,4	2,1	3,4	2,5
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Satisfactory	2,3	3,5	2,0	2,2	2,5	2,7	2,5
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Good	2,5	2,5	1,4	2,2	2,0	2,8	2,5
Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Satisfactory	2,8	2,9	1,8	2,2	1,8	2,8	2,5
Show test details

AutoMotorSport Winter tyre test 2022 245/45 R19

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	9,3	9,4	10	10	10
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Very good	8,4	7,6	8,2	8	7
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Sufficient	8,3	8,2	4,3	4	6
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 225/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	2+	2+	1
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	2+	2+	2+
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	2+
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Good	2	2-	1-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Wear
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+	1
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	1-	2	1	2	2+
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2	3+	3+	2
Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Exemplary	2-	2	2+	3+	2
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2021 195/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear
Best values in test	1,6	1,9	1,9	2,0	2,6	2,0
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory	1,7	2,5	2,8	2,3	3,3	3,0
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Satisfactory	2,7	2,3	2,4	2,4	2,9	3,0
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,1	27,3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	32,1	28,1
Falken EuroWinter HS01	36,2	29,5
Kleber KRISALP HP3	35,6	28,4
Show test details

AutoMotorSport Winter tyre test 2021 195/55 R16

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	8,7	9,6	9,3	10	10	10
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Very good	8,7	9,6	8,6	8,2	8	7
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Good	7,1	7,4	7,0	7,5	4	10
Show test details

Autoexpress Winter tyre test 2020 205/55 R16

Name	Points total	Winter	Wet	Dry	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	101,6	299,9	299,9	100	101,1	100,7
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	100	285,8	299,8	100	87,6	99,8
Falken EuroWinter HS01	98	286,4	281,7	98,9	82,6	99,7
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+	98,1	298,5	282,5	93,7	87,5	99,7
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 225/40 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	1-	2	1-
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary	1-	2	1-
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Good	2+	2-	1-
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Exemplary	2+	2	2+
Show test details

ACE Winter tyre test 2020 225/50 R17

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	200	67	48	60	18	9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Highly recommended	200	64	47	60	17	7
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Conditionally recommended	167	63	45	39	10	5
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Recommended	193	66	44	53	18	7
Show test details

AutoMotorSport Winter tyre test 2020 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	9,5	8,7	9,9	10	9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Very good	9,5	8,5	9,2	10	8
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Satisfactory	7,1	6,9	6,7	5	8
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Good	7,6	7,8	8,4	8	8
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	30,3	24,3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	30,3	24,5
Falken EuroWinter HS01	37	27
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+	34,4	24,8
Kleber KRISALP HP3	34,4	24,6
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2020 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1,3	2,0	1,8	2,1	2,5	1,0	1,8
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	1,3	2,1	2,1	2,4	2,9	2,5	2,0
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Satisfactory	2,3	2,9	2,7	2,4	3,0	2,0	2,4
Show test details

Automotorsport Winter tyre test 2019 215/55 R17

Name	Points total
Best values in test	8,9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Very good	8,8
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Good	7,4
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Very good	8,9
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	29,2	24
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	29,2	24,6
Falken EuroWinter HS01	33,9	26,1
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+	30,6	24,3
Kleber KRISALP HP3	32,2	24
Show test details

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Falken EuroWinter HS01 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Kleber KRISALP HP3

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands