18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 vs. Yokohama W.drive V905 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. Firestone Winterhawk 3

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 /0%	Uniroyal MS plus 77 /0%	Vredestein Snowtrac 5 /0%	Yokohama W.drive V905 /0%	Matador MP92 Sibir Snow /0%	Firestone Winterhawk 3 /0%

Dimensions	R14 - R21	R13 - R19	R13 - R16	R16 - R19	R15 - R18	R13 - R18
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium

2. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Premium

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Upper-middle

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 Upper-middle

5. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle

6. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 132

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 66

4. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 55

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 43

6. Yokohama W.drive V905 8

Number of tests

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 19x

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 15x

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 14x

4. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 12x

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 10x

6. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 8x

Best position in test

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 3.

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 3.

3. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 4.

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 4.

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 7.

6. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 12.

Worst position in test

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 17.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 18.

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 24.

4. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 30.

5. Firestone Winterhawk 3 32.

6. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 33.

Average position in tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 7.87

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 11.21

3. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 12.58

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 14

5. Firestone Winterhawk 3 16

6. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 22.25

Year of the last test

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 2020

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 2020

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 2019

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 2019

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 2018

6. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 2018

Best rating in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

2. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Satisfactory

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Satisfactory

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 Satisfactory

6. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory

4. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Still recommended

5. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Conditionally recommended

6. Yokohama W.drive V905 Conditionally recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

79%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

77%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

72.1%

Vredestein
Snowtrac 5

70%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

66.5%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

54%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 B

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow C

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 C

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

5. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 ?

6. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Vredestein
Snowtrac 5

84.4%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

82%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

76%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

74.4%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

73%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

66%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

80%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

77%

Vredestein
Snowtrac 5

75.1%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

74%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

72%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 C

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 E

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow F

4. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 ?

5. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

6. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
W.drive V905

82%

Vredestein
Snowtrac 5

81.9%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

79%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

77.4%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

76%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

75%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

76%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

69%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

66%

Vredestein
Snowtrac 5

66.2%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

56%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

48%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 71 dB

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 ?

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow ?

5. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 ?

6. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

89%

Vredestein
Snowtrac 5

81%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

80%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

80%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

77%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

69%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 8 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Good	1-	2-	2	2+
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	2	2+
Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	2	2-
Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2	2	2-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	32,5	28,7
Uniroyal MS plus 77	36	28,1
Yokohama W.drive V905	34,7	28,3
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	38,4	-
Firestone Winterhawk 3	36,3	27,9
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2	2+	1
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: -	2	3+	2+	1-
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: -	2-	3	1-	2+
Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Rating: -	3+	2	2-	2-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,2	25
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	38,5	25,9
Uniroyal MS plus 77	39,1	25,7
Vredestein Snowtrac 5	38,9	27,0
Yokohama W.drive V905	39,9	26,9
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	40,6	26,4
Firestone Winterhawk 3	39,8	27,5
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2016 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	2,3	2,1	1,7	2,0	2,8	1,5	1,5
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: -	2,5	2,1	3,3	2,4	3,7	2,0	2,1
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: -	2,3	3,2	2,5	2,6	3,1	2,5	1,9
Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: -	3,3	2,5	2,1	2,9	4,0	3,5	2,4
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Rating: -	3,7	2,6	2,2	2,5	3,2	2,0	1,9
Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: -	3,0	2,9	2,4	2,0	2,8	2,0	2,2
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2016 185/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1,8	1,9	1,7	2,2	2,8	1	1,5
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: -	2,8	2,6	1,9	2,9	3,6	2,5	2,0
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: -	2,7	3,3	1,7	2,9	3,7	2,5	2,0
Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Rating: -	2,7	2,3	2,6	2,6	3,6	2,5	2,4
Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: -	4,6	2,3	2,8	2,6	3,0	2,0	1,8
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2015 185/60 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1	2+	1	1
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: -	2-	2-	2+	1-
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: -	2-	3+	1-	2-
Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: -	2-	2	2	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2015 185/60 R15

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	36,8	27,7
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	43,4	28,1
Uniroyal MS plus 77	41,7	28,6
Vredestein Snowtrac 5	44,8	-
Yokohama W.drive V905	42,6	29,4
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	43,1	28,9
Firestone Winterhawk 3	41,9	28,9
Show test details

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 vs. Yokohama W.drive V905 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. Firestone Winterhawk 3

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands