12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 /0%	Uniroyal MS plus 77 /0%	Matador MP92 Sibir Snow /0%	Continental WinterContact TS 860 /0%

Dimensions	R14 - R21	R13 - R19	R15 - R18	R13 - R17
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Premium

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Upper-middle

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 132

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 76

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 43

Number of tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 23x

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 19x

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 15x

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 8x

Best position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 1.

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 3.

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 4.

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 12.

Worst position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 7.

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 17.

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 18.

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 33.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2.35

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 7.87

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 11.21

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 22.25

Year of the last test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2021

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 2020

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 2019

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 2018

Best rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Very good

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Good

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

91.6%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

79%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

77%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

72.1%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 B

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 B

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow C

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

84.2%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

82%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

74.4%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

73%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

80%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

79.4%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

74%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 C

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 C

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow F

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

90.5%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

79%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

77.4%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

75%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

79.2%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

69%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

66%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

56%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 71 dB

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 ?

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

80%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

80%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

79.5%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

77%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 8 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Good	1-	2-	2	2+
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	2	2+
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2+	2+	2-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	32,5	28,7
Uniroyal MS plus 77	36	28,1
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	38,4	-
Continental WinterContact TS 860	33,5	27,5
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2	2+	1
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: -	2	3+	2+	1-
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: -	2-	3	1-	2+
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: -	1-	2	2+	1
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,2	25
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	38,5	25,9
Uniroyal MS plus 77	39,1	25,7
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	40,6	26,4
Continental WinterContact TS 860	34,2	25,6
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2016 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	2,3	2,1	1,7	2,0	2,8	1,5	1,5
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: -	2,5	2,1	3,3	2,4	3,7	2,0	2,1
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: -	2,3	3,2	2,5	2,6	3,1	2,5	1,9
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Rating: -	3,7	2,6	2,2	2,5	3,2	2,0	1,9
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2016 185/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1,8	1,9	1,7	2,2	2,8	1	1,5
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: -	2,8	2,6	1,9	2,9	3,6	2,5	2,0
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: -	2,7	3,3	1,7	2,9	3,7	2,5	2,0
Show test details