18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Nokian WR D4 vs. Barum Polaris 3 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 /0%	Nokian WR D4 /0%	Barum Polaris 3 /0%	Uniroyal MS plus 77 /0%	Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 /0%

Dimensions	R14 - R21	R13 - R20	R13 - R18	R13 - R19	R13 - R17
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Premium

3. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Upper-middle

5. Barum Polaris 3 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 132

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 88

3. Nokian WR D4 82

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76

5. Barum Polaris 3 66

Number of tests

1. Nokian WR D4 26x

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 21x

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 19x

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 15x

5. Barum Polaris 3 10x

Best position in test

1. Nokian WR D4 2.

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 2.

3. Barum Polaris 3 3.

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 3.

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 4.

Worst position in test

1. Nokian WR D4 14.

2. Barum Polaris 3 16.

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 17.

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 18.

5. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 20.

Average position in tests

1. Nokian WR D4 6.04

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 7.1

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 7.87

4. Barum Polaris 3 10.6

5. Uniroyal MS plus 77 11.21

Year of the last test

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 2020

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 2020

3. Barum Polaris 3 2018

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 2018

5. Nokian WR D4 2018

Best rating in test

1. Barum Polaris 3 Exemplary

2. Nokian WR D4 Highly recommended

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Highly recommended

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

5. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

2. Nokian WR D4 Recommended

3. Barum Polaris 3 Satisfactory

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

5. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Satisfactory

Wet

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

85.2%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

79%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Nokian
WR D4

77%

Barum
Polaris 3

73.6%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 B

2. Nokian WR D4 B

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 C

4. Barum Polaris 3 C

5. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

83%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

83.7%

Nokian
WR D4

79%

Barum
Polaris 3

79%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

74.4%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Nokian
WR D4

83%

Barum
Polaris 3

79%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

76%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

74%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

68.9%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Nokian WR D4 C

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 C

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 E

4. Barum Polaris 3 F

5. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

90.1%

Barum
Polaris 3

87.3%

Nokian
WR D4

84%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

75%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Barum
Polaris 3

79%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

77.1%

Nokian
WR D4

70%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

69%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

54%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 71 dB

2. Barum Polaris 3 ?

3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 ?

4. Nokian WR D4 ?

5. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Nokian
WR D4

86%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

80%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

79%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

77%

Barum
Polaris 3

0%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 11 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

ACE Winter tyre test 2018 185/65 R15

Name	Points total	Winter	Wet	Dry	Rolling resistance	Noise	Running costs
Best values in test	206	67	68	43	19	8	10
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Recommended	182	58	53	43	15	6	7
Nokian WR D4 Rating: Recommended	195	65	58	40	19	6	7
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Good	1-	2-	2	2+
Nokian WR D4 Rating: Satisfactory	2	2-	2	3+
Barum Polaris 3 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2	1-	2+
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	2	2+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	32,5	28,7
Nokian WR D4	35	27,7
Barum Polaris 3	35,8	27,6
Uniroyal MS plus 77	36	28,1
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452	35,9	28,6
Show test details

Autoexpress Winter tyre test 2017 225/45 R17

Name	Points total
Best values in test	100
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	96,9
Nokian WR D4	98
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452	99,8
Show test details

Autoexpress Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	100	96,9	99,8	99	100	100
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	98,4	95,6	96	94,9	85,6	99,8
Nokian WR D4	99,7	96,9	99,5	99	85,1	97,9
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452	97,6	92,1	99,6	95,9	86,1	99,1
Show test details

Autoklub ČR Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	101	100	103,3	100,3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Good	98,6	98,3	98,9	98,6
Nokian WR D4 Rating: Good	99,3	97,4	100,5	99,9
Hankook Winter icept RS2 W452 Rating: Satisfactory*	96,2	90,3	99,4	98,9
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2	2+	1
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: -	2	3+	2+	1-
Nokian WR D4 Rating: -	2	2-	2+	2-
Barum Polaris 3 Rating: -	2	3+	2+	2+
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: -	2-	3	1-	2+
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: -	2-	2	2	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,2	25
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	38,5	25,9
Nokian WR D4	37,3	26,0
Barum Polaris 3	37,2	26,1
Uniroyal MS plus 77	39,1	25,7
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452	39,1	26,2
Show test details

GTÜ Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	412	142	127	143	25	10
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Recommended	341	100	114	127	19	8
Nokian WR D4 Rating: Highly recommended	387	124	121	142	21	8
Hankook Winter icept RS2 W452 Rating: Highly recommended*	363	104	118	141	16	10
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2016 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	2,3	2,1	1,7	2,0	2,8	1,5	1,5
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: -	2,5	2,1	3,3	2,4	3,7	2,0	2,1
Nokian WR D4 Rating: -	2,6	2,4	2,2	2,1	3,1	3,0	2,0
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: -	2,3	3,2	2,5	2,6	3,1	2,5	1,9
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2016 185/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1,8	1,9	1,7	2,2	2,8	1	1,5
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: -	2,8	2,6	1,9	2,9	3,6	2,5	2,0
Nokian WR D4 Rating: -	2,7	2,4	2,4	2,5	3,8	2,5	2,0
Barum Polaris 3 Rating: -	3,4	2,2	2,1	2,8	3,6	1,5	2,0
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: -	2,7	3,3	1,7	2,9	3,7	2,5	2,0
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: -	2,8	1,9	2,6	2,8	4,0	2,5	2,3
Show test details

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Nokian WR D4 vs. Barum Polaris 3 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands