Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium2. Michelin Alpin 5 Premium3. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Premium
Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Michelin Alpin 5 vs. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Michelin Alpin 5 5.88
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Exemplary2. Michelin Alpin 5 Very good
Worst rating in test
2. Michelin Alpin 5 Recommended3. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Still recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 9 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
9
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1- | ||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Good | 2 | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2 | 2+ | ||||
| Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Good | 1- | 2- | 2 | 2+ | |||
| Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 2 | 2+ | |||
| Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Rating: Satisfactory | 1- | 2 | 3+ | 3 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 32,5 | 28,7 | |||||
| Michelin Alpin 5 | 33,3 | 28,7 | |||||
| Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 | 32,2 | 29,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 100 | ||||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 96,9 | ||||||
| Michelin Alpin 5 | 97,5 | ||||||
| Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 | 97,9 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Noise | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 100 | 96,9 | 99,8 | 99 | 100 | 100 | |
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 98,4 | 95,6 | 96 | 94,9 | 85,6 | 99,8 | |
| Michelin Alpin 5 | 98,5 | 88,2 | 97 | 98,8 | 88,7 | 98,4 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 101 | 100 | 103,3 | 100,3 | |||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Good | 98,6 | 98,3 | 98,9 | 98,6 | |||
| Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: Very good | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |||
| Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Rating: Satisfactory | 95,2 | 89,8 | 100,2 | 95,6 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2 | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: - | 2 | 3+ | 2+ | 1- | |||
| Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: - | 2+ | 2 | 1- | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 38,5 | 25,9 | |||||
| Michelin Alpin 5 | 35,6 | 25,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Noise | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 412 | 142 | 127 | 143 | 25 | 10 | |
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Recommended | 341 | 100 | 114 | 127 | 19 | 8 | |
| Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: Highly recommended | 376 | 128 | 108 | 140 | 18 | 8 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
