12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Barum Polaris 3 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Michelin Alpin 5 vs. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 vs. Nokian WR D4 vs. Vredestein Snowtrac 5

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 /0%	Barum Polaris 3 /0%	Uniroyal MS plus 77 /0%	Michelin Alpin 5 /0%	Dunlop Winter Sport 5 /86%	Nokian WR D4 /0%	Vredestein Snowtrac 5 /0%

Dimensions	R14 - R21	R13 - R18	R13 - R19	R15 - R21	R14 - R21	R13 - R20	R13 - R16
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium

2. Michelin Alpin 5 Premium

3. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Premium

4. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Premium

5. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Upper-middle

6. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle

7. Barum Polaris 3 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 189

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 132

3. Michelin Alpin 5 91

4. Nokian WR D4 82

5. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76

6. Barum Polaris 3 66

7. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 55

Number of tests

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 48x

2. Nokian WR D4 26x

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 19x

4. Michelin Alpin 5 17x

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 15x

6. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 12x

7. Barum Polaris 3 10x

Best position in test

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 1.

2. Nokian WR D4 2.

3. Michelin Alpin 5 2.

4. Barum Polaris 3 3.

5. Uniroyal MS plus 77 3.

6. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 4.

7. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 4.

Worst position in test

1. Nokian WR D4 14.

2. Barum Polaris 3 16.

3. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 16.

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 17.

5. Michelin Alpin 5 17.

6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 18.

7. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 30.

Average position in tests

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 4.9

2. Michelin Alpin 5 5.88

3. Nokian WR D4 6.04

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 7.87

5. Barum Polaris 3 10.6

6. Uniroyal MS plus 77 11.21

7. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 12.58

Year of the last test

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 2025

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 2020

3. Barum Polaris 3 2018

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 2018

5. Michelin Alpin 5 2018

6. Nokian WR D4 2018

7. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 2018

Best rating in test

1. Barum Polaris 3 Exemplary

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Exemplary

3. Nokian WR D4 Highly recommended

4. Michelin Alpin 5 Very good

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

6. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Satisfactory

7. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

2. Nokian WR D4 Recommended

3. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Recommended

4. Michelin Alpin 5 Recommended

5. Barum Polaris 3 Satisfactory

6. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

7. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Still recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Michelin
Alpin 5

79.2%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78.6%

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

77%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

77.2%

Barum
Polaris 3

73.6%

Nokian
WR D4

71.4%

Vredestein
Snowtrac 5

70%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Michelin Alpin 5 B

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 B

3. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 B

4. Nokian WR D4 B

5. Barum Polaris 3 C

6. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

7. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Michelin
Alpin 5

84.3%

Vredestein
Snowtrac 5

84.4%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

81.7%

Barum
Polaris 3

79%

Nokian
WR D4

79.9%

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

77.4%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

74.4%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Nokian
WR D4

86.8%

Barum
Polaris 3

79%

Michelin
Alpin 5

79.4%

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

77.1%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

76.6%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

76.7%

Vredestein
Snowtrac 5

75.1%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Nokian WR D4 C

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 C

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 C

4. Michelin Alpin 5 E

5. Barum Polaris 3 F

6. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

7. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

Nokian
WR D4

91.7%

Barum
Polaris 3

87.3%

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

87.5%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

81.3%

Vredestein
Snowtrac 5

81.9%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

77.4%

Michelin
Alpin 5

72.1%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Barum
Polaris 3

79%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

73.1%

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

72.3%

Nokian
WR D4

71%

Vredestein
Snowtrac 5

66.2%

Michelin
Alpin 5

65.6%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

49.6%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 71 dB

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 72 dB

3. Barum Polaris 3 ?

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

5. Nokian WR D4 ?

6. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 ?

7. Michelin Alpin 5 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Nokian
WR D4

83.3%

Vredestein
Snowtrac 5

81%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

80%

Michelin
Alpin 5

79.3%

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

76.5%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

75.2%

Barum
Polaris 3

0%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 7 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Good	1-	2-	2	2+
Barum Polaris 3 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2	1-	2+
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	2	2+
Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2	2	2+
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2	2	2-
Nokian WR D4 Rating: Satisfactory	2	2-	2	3+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	32,5	28,7
Barum Polaris 3	35,8	27,6
Uniroyal MS plus 77	36	28,1
Michelin Alpin 5	33,3	28,7
Dunlop Winter Sport 5	33,6	27,6
Nokian WR D4	35	27,7
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2	2+	1
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: -	2	3+	2+	1-
Barum Polaris 3 Rating: -	2	3+	2+	2+
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: -	2-	3	1-	2+
Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: -	2+	2	1-	2
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: -	2+	2-	1-	2
Nokian WR D4 Rating: -	2	2-	2+	2-
Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Rating: -	3+	2	2-	2-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,2	25
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	38,5	25,9
Barum Polaris 3	37,2	26,1
Uniroyal MS plus 77	39,1	25,7
Michelin Alpin 5	35,6	25,8
Dunlop Winter Sport 5	36,1	25,5
Nokian WR D4	37,3	26,0
Vredestein Snowtrac 5	38,9	27,0
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2016 185/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1,8	1,9	1,7	2,2	2,8	1	1,5
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: -	2,8	2,6	1,9	2,9	3,6	2,5	2,0
Barum Polaris 3 Rating: -	3,4	2,2	2,1	2,8	3,6	1,5	2,0
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: -	2,7	3,3	1,7	2,9	3,7	2,5	2,0
Nokian WR D4 Rating: -	2,7	2,4	2,4	2,5	3,8	2,5	2,0
Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Rating: -	2,7	2,3	2,6	2,6	3,6	2,5	2,4
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2015 185/60 R15

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	36,8	27,7
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	43,4	28,1
Barum Polaris 3	40,8	28,6
Uniroyal MS plus 77	41,7	28,6
Vredestein Snowtrac 5	44,8	-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2015 185/60 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1	2+	1	1
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: -	2-	2-	2+	1-
Barum Polaris 3 Rating: Exemplary	2-	2	2+	2-
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: -	2-	3+	1-	2-
Show test details

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Barum Polaris 3 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Michelin Alpin 5 vs. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 vs. Nokian WR D4 vs. Vredestein Snowtrac 5

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands