12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Barum Polaris 3 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 /0%	Barum Polaris 3 /0%	Uniroyal MS plus 77 /0%	Matador MP92 Sibir Snow /0%

Dimensions	R14 - R21	R13 - R18	R13 - R19	R15 - R18
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Upper-middle

3. Barum Polaris 3 Lowcost

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 132

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76

3. Barum Polaris 3 66

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 43

Number of tests

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 19x

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 15x

3. Barum Polaris 3 10x

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 8x

Best position in test

1. Barum Polaris 3 3.

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 3.

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 4.

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 12.

Worst position in test

1. Barum Polaris 3 16.

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 17.

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 18.

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 33.

Average position in tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 7.87

2. Barum Polaris 3 10.6

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 11.21

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 22.25

Year of the last test

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 2020

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 2019

3. Barum Polaris 3 2018

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 2018

Best rating in test

1. Barum Polaris 3 Exemplary

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

2. Barum Polaris 3 Satisfactory

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory

Wet

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78.6%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

77.2%

Barum
Polaris 3

73.6%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

72.1%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 B

2. Barum Polaris 3 C

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow C

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

81.7%

Barum
Polaris 3

79%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

75.4%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

74.4%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Barum
Polaris 3

79%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

78.1%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

76.6%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

76.7%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 C

2. Barum Polaris 3 F

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow F

4. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

Barum
Polaris 3

87.3%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

81.3%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

78.3%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

77.4%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Barum
Polaris 3

79%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

73.1%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

68.2%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

49.6%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 71 dB

2. Barum Polaris 3 ?

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

80%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

79.3%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

75.2%

Barum
Polaris 3

0%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 7 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Good	1-	2-	2	2+
Barum Polaris 3 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2	1-	2+
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	2	2+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	32,5	28,7
Barum Polaris 3	35,8	27,6
Uniroyal MS plus 77	36	28,1
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	38,4	-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2	2+	1
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: -	2	3+	2+	1-
Barum Polaris 3 Rating: -	2	3+	2+	2+
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: -	2-	3	1-	2+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,2	25
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	38,5	25,9
Barum Polaris 3	37,2	26,1
Uniroyal MS plus 77	39,1	25,7
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	40,6	26,4
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2016 185/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1,8	1,9	1,7	2,2	2,8	1	1,5
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: -	2,8	2,6	1,9	2,9	3,6	2,5	2,0
Barum Polaris 3 Rating: -	3,4	2,2	2,1	2,8	3,6	1,5	2,0
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: -	2,7	3,3	1,7	2,9	3,7	2,5	2,0
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2015 185/60 R15

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	36,8	27,7
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	43,4	28,1
Barum Polaris 3	40,8	28,6
Uniroyal MS plus 77	41,7	28,6
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	43,1	28,9
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2015 185/60 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1	2+	1	1
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: -	2-	2-	2+	1-
Barum Polaris 3 Rating: Exemplary	2-	2	2+	2-
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: -	2-	3+	1-	2-
Show test details

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Barum Polaris 3 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands