12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Barum Polaris 3 vs. Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860 vs. Dunlop Winter Sport 5

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 /0%	Barum Polaris 3 /0%	Firestone Winterhawk 3 /0%	Matador MP92 Sibir Snow /0%	Continental WinterContact TS 860 /0%	Dunlop Winter Sport 5 /86%

Dimensions	R14 - R21	R13 - R18	R13 - R18	R15 - R18	R13 - R17	R14 - R21
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Premium

3. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Premium

4. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle

5. Barum Polaris 3 Lowcost

6. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 189

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 132

3. Continental WinterContact TS 860 76

4. Firestone Winterhawk 3 66

5. Barum Polaris 3 66

6. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 43

Number of tests

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 48x

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 23x

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 15x

4. Firestone Winterhawk 3 14x

5. Barum Polaris 3 10x

6. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 8x

Best position in test

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 1.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 1.

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 3.

4. Barum Polaris 3 3.

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 4.

6. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 12.

Worst position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 7.

2. Barum Polaris 3 16.

3. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 16.

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 18.

5. Firestone Winterhawk 3 32.

6. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 33.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2.35

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 4.9

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 7.87

4. Barum Polaris 3 10.6

5. Firestone Winterhawk 3 16

6. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 22.25

Year of the last test

1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 2025

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2021

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 2020

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 2019

5. Barum Polaris 3 2018

6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 2018

Best rating in test

1. Barum Polaris 3 Exemplary

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Exemplary

3. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Very good

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

5. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Satisfactory

6. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Good

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

3. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Recommended

4. Barum Polaris 3 Satisfactory

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory

6. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Conditionally recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

91.6%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78.6%

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

77%

Barum
Polaris 3

73.6%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

72.1%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

66.5%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 B

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 B

3. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 B

4. Barum Polaris 3 C

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow C

6. Firestone Winterhawk 3 C

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

84.2%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

81.7%

Barum
Polaris 3

79%

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

77.4%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

75.4%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

75.8%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

80.3%

Barum
Polaris 3

79%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

79.4%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

78.1%

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

77.1%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

76.6%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 C

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 C

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 C

4. Firestone Winterhawk 3 E

5. Barum Polaris 3 F

6. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow F

Snow

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

90.5%

Barum
Polaris 3

87.3%

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

87.5%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

81.4%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

78.3%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

77.4%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Barum
Polaris 3

79%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

79.2%

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

72.3%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

70.3%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

68.2%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

49.6%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 71 dB

2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 72 dB

3. Barum Polaris 3 ?

4. Continental WinterContact TS 860 ?

5. Firestone Winterhawk 3 ?

6. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

82.7%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

80%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

79.3%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

79.5%

Dunlop
Winter Sport 5

76.5%

Barum
Polaris 3

0%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 7 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Good	1-	2-	2	2+
Barum Polaris 3 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2	1-	2+
Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2	2	2-
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2+	2+	2-
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2	2	2-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	32,5	28,7
Barum Polaris 3	35,8	27,6
Firestone Winterhawk 3	36,3	27,9
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	38,4	-
Continental WinterContact TS 860	33,5	27,5
Dunlop Winter Sport 5	33,6	27,6
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2	2+	1
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: -	2	3+	2+	1-
Barum Polaris 3 Rating: -	2	3+	2+	2+
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: -	1-	2	2+	1
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: -	2+	2-	1-	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,2	25
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	38,5	25,9
Barum Polaris 3	37,2	26,1
Firestone Winterhawk 3	39,8	27,5
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	40,6	26,4
Continental WinterContact TS 860	34,2	25,6
Dunlop Winter Sport 5	36,1	25,5
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2016 185/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1,8	1,9	1,7	2,2	2,8	1	1,5
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: -	2,8	2,6	1,9	2,9	3,6	2,5	2,0
Barum Polaris 3 Rating: -	3,4	2,2	2,1	2,8	3,6	1,5	2,0
Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: -	4,6	2,3	2,8	2,6	3,0	2,0	1,8
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2015 185/60 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1	2+	1	1
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: -	2-	2-	2+	1-
Barum Polaris 3 Rating: Exemplary	2-	2	2+	2-
Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: -	2-	2	2	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2015 185/60 R15

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	36,8	27,7
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	43,4	28,1
Barum Polaris 3	40,8	28,6
Firestone Winterhawk 3	41,9	28,9
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	43,1	28,9
Show test details

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Barum Polaris 3 vs. Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860 vs. Dunlop Winter Sport 5

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands