Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Barum Polaris 3

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Czech Republic (Barum). Barum is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Barum (73%). But when it comes to comparing Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 and Barum Polaris 3, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the Blizzak LM-001 and the Polaris 3 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 72% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Barum Polaris 3 has C rating. We also know where Blizzak LM-001 is made - Poland.

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 /0%	Barum Polaris 3 /0%	Add to comparison Make Model New comparison

Dimensions	R14 - R21	R13 - R18
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

/0%

Barum Polaris 3

/0%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

New comparison

Dimensions

R14 - R21

R13 - R18

Price

Set dimension to see prices

Remove

Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium

2. Barum Polaris 3 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 132

2. Barum Polaris 3 66

Number of tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 15x

2. Barum Polaris 3 10x

Best position in test

1. Barum Polaris 3 3.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 4.

Worst position in test

1. Barum Polaris 3 16.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 18.

Average position in tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 7.87

2. Barum Polaris 3 10.6

Year of the last test

1. Barum Polaris 3 2018

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 2018

Best rating in test

1. Barum Polaris 3 Exemplary

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

Worst rating in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

2. Barum Polaris 3 Satisfactory

Wet

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78.6%

Barum
Polaris 3

73.6%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 B

2. Barum Polaris 3 C

Dry

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

81.7%

Barum
Polaris 3

79%

Snow

(Overall rating)

Barum
Polaris 3

87.3%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

77.4%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Barum
Polaris 3

79%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

76.6%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 C

2. Barum Polaris 3 F

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Barum
Polaris 3

79%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

49.6%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 71 dB

2. Barum Polaris 3 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

80%

Barum
Polaris 3

0%

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 7 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Good	1-	2-	2	2+
Barum Polaris 3 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2	1-	2+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	32,5	28,7
Barum Polaris 3	35,8	27,6
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2	2+	1
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: -	2	3+	2+	1-
Barum Polaris 3 Rating: -	2	3+	2+	2+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,2	25
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	38,5	25,9
Barum Polaris 3	37,2	26,1
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2016 185/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1,8	1,9	1,7	2,2	2,8	1	1,5
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: -	2,8	2,6	1,9	2,9	3,6	2,5	2,0
Barum Polaris 3 Rating: -	3,4	2,2	2,1	2,8	3,6	1,5	2,0
Show test details