Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Premium3. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Lowcost
Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870
| # | Bridgestone Blizzak 6
| GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo
| Continental WinterContact TS 870
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 |  |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R22 | R13 - R17 | R14 - R18 | |
| Price | ||||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Exemplary2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Very good3. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
3. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2 | 2+ | 2 | |||
| GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 3 | 3+ | 3 | |||
| Continental WinterContact TS 870 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak 6 | 34.6 | 29.6 | |||||
| GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo | 36.0 | 29.3 | |||||
| Continental WinterContact TS 870 | 37.1 | 29.1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
