Segment
2. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Lowcost
Comparison: GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (GT) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than GT (50%). In this particular case, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 has a better rating of 99% compared to 61% of the GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo. The first tyre test of GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo was done in 2024, compared to 2020 when was the Continental WinterContact TS 870 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Radial Winter Pro 2 evo and the WinterContact TS 870 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo
| Continental WinterContact TS 870
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R14 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Very good2. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
| GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 3 | 3+ | 3 | |||
| Continental WinterContact TS 870 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Winter | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1.6 | 1.9 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 2.9 | 1.7 | 2.0 |
| GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Rating: Sufficient | 2.9 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 4.3 | 3.1 | 3.3 | 3.6 |
| Continental WinterContact TS 870 Rating: Good | 1.6 | 1.9 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 2.9 | 1.8 | 2.1 |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo | 36.0 | 29.3 | |||||
| Continental WinterContact TS 870 | 37.1 | 29.1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
