Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Upper-middle
Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good
Worst rating in test
3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended
Dry
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1– | 1 | |||
| BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 Rating: Good | 3 | 2– | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Rating: Good | 2+ | 2+ | 1– | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.1 | |||||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 36.0 | 27.3 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ | 33.5 | 28.3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
