18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 (2026)

11 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 dominates wet conditions; BFGoodrich G-Force Winter 2 wins on snow and comfort.

The BFGoodrich G-Force Winter 2 and Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 represent two very different philosophies in winter tyre design. The BFGoodrich, backed by Michelin Group engineering, has built a reputation as a snow specialist with impressive traction on white roads and a remarkably quiet ride. The Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005, on the other hand, is a premium wet-weather weapon — one of the strongest performers in wet braking across independent tests. Both are winter tyres, but they excel in very different conditions, making this comparison a tale of two climates.

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Number of tests
23
49
Best position
#1
#1
Average position
6.7
3.2
Latest test
2025
2024
Available sizes
109
244

Performance comparison

Averaged from 11 tests

Wet Performance
Confidence
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Wet Braking
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Wet Handling
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
91%
Wet Circle Cornering
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
91%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Aquaplaning Cross
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%

Wet performance is where the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 truly dominates. Across four independent comparative tests, the Blizzak LM-005 averaged 28.2 metres in wet braking, compared to 30.6 metres for the BFGoodrich G-Force Winter 2 — a gap of 2.4 metres that translates to a meaningful safety margin in real-world emergency stops. Bridgestone's wet grip score of 90.2 and wet braking sub-score of 94.6 place the Blizzak LM-005 among the top performers in its segment on wet surfaces. Aquaplaning resistance is solid on both tyres, though the BFGoodrich holds its own better than its braking distances might suggest. Overall, for drivers in wet winter climates, the Blizzak LM-005 is the clear choice.

Dry Performance
Confidence
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
71%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Dry Braking
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
Dry Handling
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
88%
Dry Lane Change
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
Dry Steering Reaction
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%

On dry roads, neither tyre is particularly distinguished, but the gap between them is meaningful. The Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 offers better dry braking and more confident handling at the limit, consistent with its premium positioning and sporty character. The BFGoodrich G-Force Winter 2 trails here, with longer stopping distances in dry conditions noted across multiple tests. For drivers in mixed-climate regions where dry spells are common even in winter, the Blizzak LM-005's dry competence is a real advantage.

Snow Performance
Confidence
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
91%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Snow Braking
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
94%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Snow Traction
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Snow Handling
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Snow Circle Cornering
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%

The BFGoodrich G-Force Winter 2 reclaims ground on snow — its strongest domain. Across three independent snow braking tests, the G-Force Winter 2 averaged 27.5 metres, edging the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 at 28.4 metres. With a snow score of 93.2, the BFGoodrich is genuinely elite on snow-covered roads, offering strong traction and confidence in the conditions many winter tyre buyers worry about most. The Blizzak LM-005's snow handling has been flagged as a relative weakness in several test reports, and this data confirms the pattern. Drivers who regularly encounter snowfall will find the G-Force Winter 2 the more capable companion.

Ice Performance
Confidence
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Ice Braking Abs
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
76%
Ice Lateral Guidance
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
Comfort & Noise
Confidence
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
75%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Noise Exterior
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
75%
Noise Interior
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
69%
Ride Comfort
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%

The BFGoodrich G-Force Winter 2 stands out as the quieter, more refined tyre of the two. Tyre noise is notably low for the segment, making it a good option for drivers who spend long hours on motorways and value a calm cabin. Ride comfort is also well-rated, with the tyre absorbing road imperfections competently. The Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 is no harsh rider, but it prioritises grip over refinement and is somewhat noisier by comparison. If ride quality matters to you, the BFGoodrich has the edge here.

Economy
Confidence
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
74%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
75%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Rolling Resistance
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Mileage
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
63%

Performance spider chart

Verdict

In head-to-head testing across 17 shared evaluations, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 wins 14 times, the BFGoodrich G-Force Winter 2 just 3. That record largely reflects the Blizzak's dominance on wet and dry surfaces, where the majority of winter driving takes place in Western and Central Europe. But the BFGoodrich punches back on snow — the condition that most winter tyre buyers actually fear — and offers a quieter, more comfortable ride.

The choice comes down to your climate. If you live where winters mean rain and slush more than snow, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 is the stronger, safer all-round winter tyre. If your winters are genuinely snowy and you want a relaxed, quiet ride alongside excellent snow traction, the BFGoodrich G-Force Winter 2 is a seriously underrated option — especially given its Michelin Group engineering heritage. Note also that the Blizzak LM-005 has been succeeded by the Blizzak 6, so availability and pricing of the LM-005 may vary.

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
ADACADAC
Winter
2022185/65 R15View
AutoMotorSportAutoMotorSport
Winter
2021195/55 R16View
ADACADAC
Winter
2021195/65 R15View
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2021205/55 R16View
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2022215/55 R17View
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2020225/40 R18View
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2019225/45 R17View
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2021225/45 R18View
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2023225/45 R18View
AutoMotorSportAutoMotorSport
Winter
2020225/50 R17View
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2020245/45 R18View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.