10 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from USA. BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, GoodYear winter tyres are slightly better rated (76%) than BFGoodrich (67%). In this particular case, the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has a better rating of 89% compared to 88% of the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+. The first tyre test of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 was done in 2017, compared to 2019 when was the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/60 R16 test, where both the G-FORCE WINTER 2 and the UltraGrip Performance+ were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 88% of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (82%) of the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ also have B wet ratings. We also know where G-FORCE WINTER 2 is made - Romania/Poland.

#	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /89%	GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ /88%

Dimensions	R14 - R19	R15 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Premium

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 177

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

Number of tests

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 22x

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 19x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 1.

Worst position in test

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 8.

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 11.

Average position in tests

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 3.32

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 5.63

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2023

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 2023

Best rating in test

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Very good

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

Worst rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
79%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
71%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 89%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 78%

Wet braking

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 75%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 89%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 84%

Wet handling

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 78%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

Wet circle cornering

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 79%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ ?

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
76%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
71%

Dry braking

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 78%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 74%

Dry handling

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 77%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 66%

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
84%

Snow traction

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 92%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 86%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 94%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 86%

Snow handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 86%

Snow cornering

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 80%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
84%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
78%

Exterior noise

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 89%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 75%

Comfort

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 81%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 79%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69 dB

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 72 dB

Costs

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
75%

Rolling resistance

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 80%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 80%

Mileage

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 76%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 76%

Price/value

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ 69%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ ?

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
69.5%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
65.7%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

ADAC Winter tyre test 2023 205/60 R16

Name	Enviromental impact	Driving safety
Best values in test	2	2.1
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2.4	2.7
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Good	2.4	2.3
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,8	25,4
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,8	25,4
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+	35,5	25,5
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	2+	2+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2-	2	1-	2
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Exemplary	2	2	1-	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 225/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	2+	2+	1
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2	1
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Good	2	2-	1-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 225/40 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	1-	2	1-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	1-
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Exemplary	2+	2	2+
Show test details

ACE Winter tyre test 2020 225/50 R17

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	200	67	48	60	18	9
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Recommended	194	63	42	60	14	9
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Recommended	193	66	44	53	18	7
Show test details

AutoMotorSport Winter tyre test 2020 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	9,5	8,7	9,9	10	9
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Very good	7,0	7,3	9,9	10	8
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Good	7,6	7,8	8,4	8	8
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	1-	2+	1-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Exemplary	2	2	2+	2+
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Exemplary	2	2+	1-	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	1-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2+	2-	1-	2
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Exemplary	1-	2	1-	2
Show test details

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands