14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from USA. BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, GoodYear winter tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than BFGoodrich (75%). In this particular case, the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 has a better rating of 96% compared to 84% of the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2. The first tyre test of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 was done in 2017, compared to 2023 when was the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the G-FORCE WINTER 2 and the UltraGrip Performance 3 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (52%) of the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 also have B wet ratings. We also know where G-FORCE WINTER 2 is made - Romania/Poland.

#	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /84%	GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 /96%

Dimensions	R14 - R19	R14 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Premium

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 165

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

Number of tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 21x

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 15x

Best position in test

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 1.

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

Worst position in test

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 9.

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

Average position in tests

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 2.8

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.19

Year of the last test

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 2024

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2023

Best rating in test

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Test winner

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

Worst rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Recommended

Dry

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

68%

Dry braking

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 80%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

Dry handling

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 78%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

Wet

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

81%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

75%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 85%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

Wet braking

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 77%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 64%

Wet handling

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 84%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 83%

Wet circle cornering

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 78%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 B

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

Snow

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

84%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

83%

Snow traction

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 87%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 87%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 83%

Snow cornering

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 85%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 77%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

81%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

76%

Exterior noise

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 79%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 79%

Comfort

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 83%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 74%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 ?

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

78%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

69%

Mileage

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 92%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 C

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

Ice

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80.5%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

0%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

AUTOBILD Winter tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2	2-	2	2
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 Rating: Exemplary	2	2+	1	2+
Show test details

AUTOBILD Winter tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34.6	28.9
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	37.5	29.4
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3	36.9	29.4
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2023 225/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2	2-	1-	2
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2	2+	1-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2023 225/45 R18

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	31,4	29,2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,2	29,3
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3	33,9	30,1
Show test details

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands