Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium2. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Premium3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle
| # | BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
| Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R19 | R14 - R21 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | ||||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium2. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Premium3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle
1. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Exemplary2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good
3. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Still recommended
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 1 | 2 | |||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Good | 1- | 2- | 2 | 2+ | |||
| Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Rating: Satisfactory | 1- | 2 | 3+ | 3 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 35,1 | 25,9 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 32,5 | 28,7 | |||||
| Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 | 32,2 | 29,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||