18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN vs. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 vs. Kumho PorTran CW51

Table of contents:

Summary
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER /0%	Michelin AGILIS ALPIN /0%	Falken EuroWinter VAN01 /0%	Bridgestone Blizzak W810 /0%	Kumho PorTran CW51 /0%

Dimensions	R14 - R16	R15 - R17	R14 - R17	R14 - R17	R14 - R17
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Premium

2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Premium

3. BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER Upper-middle

4. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 Upper-middle

5. Kumho PorTran CW51 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 56

2. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 32

3. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 23

4. Kumho PorTran CW51 21

5. BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER 15

Number of tests

1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 2x

2. BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER 1x

3. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 1x

4. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 1x

5. Kumho PorTran CW51 1x

Best position in test

1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 3.

2. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 6.

3. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 7.

4. Kumho PorTran CW51 8.

5. BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER 13.

Worst position in test

1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 3.

2. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 6.

3. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 7.

4. Kumho PorTran CW51 8.

5. BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER 13.

Average position in tests

1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 3

2. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 6

3. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 7

4. Kumho PorTran CW51 8

5. BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER 13

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER 2019

2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 2019

3. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 2019

4. Kumho PorTran CW51 2019

5. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 2019

Best rating in test

1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Recommended

2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Conditionally recommended

3. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 Conditionally recommended

4. Kumho PorTran CW51 Conditionally recommended

5. BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER ?

Worst rating in test

1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Still recommended

2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Conditionally recommended

3. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 Conditionally recommended

4. Kumho PorTran CW51 Conditionally recommended

5. BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER ?

Wet

(Overall rating)

Michelin
AGILIS ALPIN

67%

Falken
EuroWinter VAN01

66%

Kumho
PorTran CW51

64%

Bridgestone
Blizzak W810

55%

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER

46

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Kumho PorTran CW51 78%

2. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 67%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 67%

4. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 59%

5. BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER 56%

Wet braking

1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 75%

2. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 71%

3. Kumho PorTran CW51 49%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 40%

5. BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER 40%

Wet circle cornering

1. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 72%

2. Kumho PorTran CW51 72%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 61%

4. BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER 61%

5. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 61%

Wet handling

1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 69%

2. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 57%

3. Kumho PorTran CW51 46%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 34%

5. BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER 23%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Kumho PorTran CW51 78%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 78%

3. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 67%

4. BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER 67%

5. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 67%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER B

2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN B

3. Kumho PorTran CW51 C

4. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 C

5. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

Michelin
AGILIS ALPIN

84%

Bridgestone
Blizzak W810

79%

Kumho
PorTran CW51

70%

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER

68

Falken
EuroWinter VAN01

48%

Snow traction

1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 92%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 83%

3. Kumho PorTran CW51 72%

4. BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER 72%

5. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 50%

Snow braking

1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 89%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 78%

3. Kumho PorTran CW51 78%

4. BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER 78%

5. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 56%

Snow handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 76%

2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 74%

3. Kumho PorTran CW51 60%

4. BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER 53%

5. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 40%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Falken
EuroWinter VAN01

68%

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER

64

Michelin
AGILIS ALPIN

59%

Bridgestone
Blizzak W810

49%

Kumho
PorTran CW51

49%

Dry braking

1. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 89%

2. BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER 82%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 78%

4. Kumho PorTran CW51 78%

5. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 61%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Falken
EuroWinter VAN01

81%

Michelin
AGILIS ALPIN

75%

Kumho
PorTran CW51

71%

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER

66

Bridgestone
Blizzak W810

56%

Exterior noise

1. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 91%

2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 81%

3. Kumho PorTran CW51 71%

4. BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER 71%

5. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 44%

Interior noise

1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 77%

2. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 71%

3. Kumho PorTran CW51 71%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 67%

5. BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER 60%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 75 dB

2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN ?

3. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 ?

4. Kumho PorTran CW51 ?

5. BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER

86

Falken
EuroWinter VAN01

86%

Michelin
AGILIS ALPIN

84%

Kumho
PorTran CW51

78%

Bridgestone
Blizzak W810

74%

Costs

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER

90

Falken
EuroWinter VAN01

89%

Michelin
AGILIS ALPIN

87%

Kumho
PorTran CW51

76%

Bridgestone
Blizzak W810

76%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Kumho PorTran CW51 D

2. BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER E

3. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN E

4. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 E

5. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

ADAC Winter tyre test 2019 205/65 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	2,4	2,3	2,2	2,3	2,5	2,0	1,6
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER Rating: Not recommended	4,9	3,4	3,1	2,3	3,3	2,0	1,7
Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Rating: Recommended	2,9	3,4	2,5	2,4	3,2	2,0	2,0
Falken EuroWinter VAN01 Rating: Conditionally recommended	3,3	3,2	4,0	2,3	2,6	2,0	1,8
Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Rating: Conditionally recommended	4,0	4,1	2,6	2,8	3,7	3,0	2,0
Kumho PorTran CW51 Rating: Conditionally recommended	3,6	4,1	3,0	2,6	3,0	3,0	2,0
Show test details

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN vs. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 vs. Kumho PorTran CW51

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands