Comparison: Michelin AGILIS ALPIN vs. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 vs. Kumho PorTran CW51

Premium

Michelin

AGILIS ALPIN

R15 – R17

VS

Upper-middle

Falken

Also compare with

Turanza T005

Test Profile

AGILIS ALPIN

EuroWinter VAN01

Blizzak W810

PorTran CW51

Number of tests

2

1

Best position

#3

#6

#7

#8

Average position

3.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

Latest test

2019

Available sizes

23

32

56

21

Dry

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

58%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

82%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

67%

Kumho PorTran CW51

67%

Dry braking

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

61%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

89%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

78%

Kumho PorTran CW51

78%

Wet

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

58%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

66%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

51%

Kumho PorTran CW51

61%

Wet circle cornering

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

61%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

61%

Kumho PorTran CW51

72%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

59%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

67%

Kumho PorTran CW51

78%

Wet handling

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

69%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

57%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

34%

Kumho PorTran CW51

46%

Wet braking

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

75%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

40%

Kumho PorTran CW51

49%

Aquaplaning - cross

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

67%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

78%

Kumho PorTran CW51

78%

Snow

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

75%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

48%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

78%

Kumho PorTran CW51

70%

Snow handling

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

74%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

40%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

76%

Kumho PorTran CW51

60%

Snow traction

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

92%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

50%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

83%

Kumho PorTran CW51

72%

Snow braking

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

89%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

56%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

78%

Kumho PorTran CW51

78%

Comfort

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

90%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

58%

Kumho PorTran CW51

71%

Interior noise

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

77%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

67%

Kumho PorTran CW51

71%

Exterior noise

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

81%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

91%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

44%

Kumho PorTran CW51

71%

Costs

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

43%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

89%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

73%

Kumho PorTran CW51

73%

Ice

Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

83%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

86%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

74%

Kumho PorTran CW51

78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Organization	Season	Year	Dimension
ADAC	Winter	2019	205/65 R16	View

Comparison: Michelin AGILIS ALPIN vs. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 vs. Kumho PorTran CW51

AGILIS ALPIN

EuroWinter VAN01

Blizzak W810

PorTran CW51

Test Profile

Dry

Wet

Snow

Comfort

Costs

Ice

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Add to comparison