12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Barum Polaris 5 vs. Kleber KRISALP HP3 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Barum Polaris 5 /63%	Kleber KRISALP HP3 /77%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 /82%

Dimensions	R13 - R19	R14 - R20	R14 - R19	R14 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Upper-middle

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

4. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 113

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

4. Barum Polaris 5 76

Number of tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 49x

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 28x

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

4. Barum Polaris 5 13x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 1.

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 2.

4. Barum Polaris 5 9.

Worst position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 15.

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 16.

4. Barum Polaris 5 26.

Average position in tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 3.2

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 8.04

4. Barum Polaris 5 15.15

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 2025

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2024

4. Barum Polaris 5 2023

Best rating in test

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Exemplary

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good

4. Barum Polaris 5 Good

Worst rating in test

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Good

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended

4. Barum Polaris 5 Sufficient

Wet

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

88%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

74%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

73%

Barum
Polaris 5

63%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 80%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

4. Barum Polaris 5 65%

Wet braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 97%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 64%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 64%

4. Barum Polaris 5 58%

Wet handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 75%

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 67%

4. Barum Polaris 5 63%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 84%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 84%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

4. Barum Polaris 5 62%

Wet circle cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 69%

4. Barum Polaris 5 69%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 A

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

3. Barum Polaris 5 C

4. Kleber KRISALP HP3 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

85%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

85%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

81%

Barum
Polaris 5

74%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 88%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 78%

4. Barum Polaris 5 74%

Snow traction

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 85%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 82%

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 78%

4. Barum Polaris 5 75%

Snow handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 94%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 83%

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 78%

4. Barum Polaris 5 78%

Snow cornering

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 86%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 82%

4. Barum Polaris 5 72%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

77%

Barum
Polaris 5

71%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

69%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

66%

Dry braking

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 70%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 70%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

4. Barum Polaris 5 63%

Dry handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 85%

2. Barum Polaris 5 78%

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 69%

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 64%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

80%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

75%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

74%

Barum
Polaris 5

67%

Exterior noise

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 81%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 82%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 77%

4. Barum Polaris 5 72%

Comfort

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 76%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 76%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 71%

4. Barum Polaris 5 61%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 ?

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

4. Barum Polaris 5 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Barum
Polaris 5

79%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

69%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

66%

Mileage

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 75%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 69%

3. Barum Polaris 5 70%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 60%

Price/value

1. Barum Polaris 5 86%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 74%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 66%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 61%

Rolling resistance

1. Barum Polaris 5 82%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 71%

4. Kleber KRISALP HP3 63%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 C

2. Barum Polaris 5 E

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

4. Kleber KRISALP HP3 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Barum
Polaris 5

82%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80.5%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

80.7%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

77.7%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 11 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

AUTOBILD Winter tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Barum Polaris 5 Rating: Satisfactory	3	3+	3	2
Kleber Krisalp HP3 Rating: Good	2	2-	2	2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2	2-	2	2
Show test details

AUTOBILD Winter tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34.6	28.9
Barum Polaris 5	37.7	30.0
Kleber Krisalp HP3	37.8	29.3
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	37.5	29.4
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2023 205/60 R16

Name	Enviromental impact	Driving safety
Best values in test	2	2.1
Barum Polaris 5 Rating: Satisfactory	2.3	3.4
Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Satisfactory	2.4	3
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2.4	2.7
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	3.1	2.1
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2023 225/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Barum Polaris 5 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2	2+	1-
Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	1-	2-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2	2-	1-	2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory	1-	2	2-	3+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2023 225/45 R18

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	31,4	29,2
Barum Polaris 5	35,6	31,0
Kleber Krisalp HP3	35,1	29,3
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,2	29,3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	31,4	30,9
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,8	25,4
Barum Polaris 5	37,5	26,9
Kleber KRISALP HP3	37,3	25,5
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,8	25,4
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	32,8	26,3
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Wear
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+	1
Barum Polaris 5 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	3+	2+	1-	2+
Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Exemplary	2-	2	2+	3+	2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2	3+	1-	3+	2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	1-	2	1	2	2+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,1	27,3
Barum Polaris 5	36,1	28,8
Kleber KRISALP HP3	35,6	28,4
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,6	27,9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	32,1	28,1
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	1-	2+	1-
Barum Polaris 5 Rating: Good	2-	2	2	2-
Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Exemplary	2	2	2+	2+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Exemplary	2	2	2+	2+
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2+	1-	2
Show test details