Segment
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Upper-middle2. Barum Polaris 3 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Czech Republic (Barum) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Barum is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Barum winter tyres are slightly better rated (73%) than Yokohama (46%). But when it comes to comparing Barum Polaris 3 and Yokohama BluEarth winter V905, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Barum Polaris 3 was done in 2015, compared to 2018 when was the Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 195/65 R15 test, where both the Polaris 3 and the BluEarth winter V905 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Barum Polaris 3 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (78%) of the Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 also have C wet ratings.
| # | Barum Polaris 3
| Yokohama BluEarth winter V905
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R18 | R13 - R23 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Upper-middle2. Barum Polaris 3 Lowcost
1. Barum Polaris 3 10.6
1. Barum Polaris 3 Exemplary2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory
1. Barum Polaris 3 Satisfactory2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |||
| Barum Polaris 3 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2- | 2+ | 2- | |||
| Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2+ | 3+ | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||