18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Barum Polaris 3 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 vs. Yokohama W.drive V905

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Barum Polaris 3 /0%	Uniroyal MS plus 77 /0%	Vredestein Snowtrac 5 /0%	Yokohama W.drive V905 /0%

Dimensions	R13 - R18	R13 - R19	R13 - R16	R16 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Premium

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Upper-middle

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 Upper-middle

4. Barum Polaris 3 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76

2. Barum Polaris 3 66

3. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 55

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 8

Number of tests

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 19x

2. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 12x

3. Barum Polaris 3 10x

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 10x

Best position in test

1. Barum Polaris 3 3.

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 3.

3. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 4.

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 7.

Worst position in test

1. Barum Polaris 3 16.

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 17.

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 24.

4. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 30.

Average position in tests

1. Barum Polaris 3 10.6

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 11.21

3. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 12.58

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 14

Year of the last test

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 2020

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 2019

3. Barum Polaris 3 2018

4. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 2018

Best rating in test

1. Barum Polaris 3 Exemplary

2. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Satisfactory

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Barum Polaris 3 Satisfactory

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

3. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Still recommended

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 Conditionally recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

86%

Vredestein
Snowtrac 5

75%

Barum
Polaris 3

74%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

68.9%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Barum Polaris 3 C

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

3. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 ?

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

Barum
Polaris 3

88%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

85%

Vredestein
Snowtrac 5

82%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

74%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Barum
Polaris 3

78%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

78%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

71.8%

Vredestein
Snowtrac 5

69%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Barum Polaris 3 F

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

4. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

83%

Vredestein
Snowtrac 5

78%

Barum
Polaris 3

75%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

59.4%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

2. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 ?

3. Barum Polaris 3 ?

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
W.drive V905

91.1%

Vredestein
Snowtrac 5

87%

Barum
Polaris 3

79%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

74%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 9 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2018 195/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2+	1	1
Barum Polaris 3 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2-	2+	2-
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Satisfactory	2	3	2	2
Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2	2	2-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2018 195/65 R15

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,3	27
Barum Polaris 3	36,7	27,8
Uniroyal MS plus 77	36,1	27,9
Vredestein Snowtrac 5	38	27,9
Yokohama W.drive V905	36,6	29,5
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Barum Polaris 3 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2	1-	2+
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	2	2+
Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	2	2-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
Barum Polaris 3	35,8	27,6
Uniroyal MS plus 77	36	28,1
Yokohama W.drive V905	34,7	28,3
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2	2+	1
Barum Polaris 3 Rating: -	2	3+	2+	2+
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: -	2-	3	1-	2+
Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Rating: -	3+	2	2-	2-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,2	25
Barum Polaris 3	37,2	26,1
Uniroyal MS plus 77	39,1	25,7
Vredestein Snowtrac 5	38,9	27,0
Yokohama W.drive V905	39,9	26,9
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2016 185/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1,8	1,9	1,7	2,2	2,8	1	1,5
Barum Polaris 3 Rating: -	3,4	2,2	2,1	2,8	3,6	1,5	2,0
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: -	2,7	3,3	1,7	2,9	3,7	2,5	2,0
Vredestein Snowtrac 5 Rating: -	2,7	2,3	2,6	2,6	3,6	2,5	2,4
Show test details