Segment
1. Barum Polaris 3 Lowcost2. Tristar Snowpower HP Lowcost3. Apollo Amazer 4G ECO Lowcost
Comparison: Barum Polaris 3 vs. Tristar Snowpower HP vs. Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Barum Polaris 3 10.6
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Barum Polaris 3 Exemplary2. Apollo Amazer 4G ECO Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Apollo Amazer 4G ECO Satisfactory2. Barum Polaris 3 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,3 | 27 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 3 | 36,7 | 27,8 | |||||
| Tristar Snowpower HP | 42 | - | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
