Comparison: Barum Polaris 3 vs. Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

#	Barum Polaris 3 /0%	Firestone Winterhawk 3 /0%	Matador MP92 Sibir Snow /0%	Add to comparison Make Model New comparison

Dimensions	R13 - R18	R13 - R18	R15 - R18
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Barum Polaris 3

/0%

Firestone Winterhawk 3

/0%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

/0%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

New comparison

Dimensions

R13 - R18

R15 - R18

Price

Set dimension to see prices

Remove

Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle

2. Barum Polaris 3 Lowcost

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 66

2. Barum Polaris 3 66

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 43

Number of tests

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 14x

2. Barum Polaris 3 10x

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 8x

Best position in test

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 3.

2. Barum Polaris 3 3.

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 12.

Worst position in test

1. Barum Polaris 3 16.

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 32.

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 33.

Average position in tests

1. Barum Polaris 3 10.6

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 16

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 22.25

Year of the last test

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 2020

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 2019

3. Barum Polaris 3 2018

Best rating in test

1. Barum Polaris 3 Exemplary

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Satisfactory

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Barum Polaris 3 Satisfactory

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Conditionally recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Barum
Polaris 3

74%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

71%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

70%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Barum Polaris 3 C

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow C

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 C

Snow

(Overall rating)

Barum
Polaris 3

88%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

85%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

77%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

83%

Barum
Polaris 3

78%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

76%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 E

2. Barum Polaris 3 F

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow F

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

88%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

78%

Barum
Polaris 3

75%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow ?

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 ?

3. Barum Polaris 3 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Barum
Polaris 3

79%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

76%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

76%

Add to comparison

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2018 195/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2+	1	1
Barum Polaris 3 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2-	2+	2-
Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: Conditionally recommended	3	3+	2+	2+
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2-	2-	2-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2018 195/65 R15

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,3	27
Barum Polaris 3	36,7	27,8
Firestone Winterhawk 3	38,2	27,8
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	36,6	28,6
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Barum Polaris 3 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2	1-	2+
Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2	2	2-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
Barum Polaris 3	35,8	27,6
Firestone Winterhawk 3	36,3	27,9
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	38,4	-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,2	25
Barum Polaris 3	37,2	26,1
Firestone Winterhawk 3	39,8	27,5
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	40,6	26,4
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2016 185/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1,8	1,9	1,7	2,2	2,8	1	1,5
Barum Polaris 3 Rating: -	3,4	2,2	2,1	2,8	3,6	1,5	2,0
Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: -	4,6	2,3	2,8	2,6	3,0	2,0	1,8
Show test details