Segment
1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Upper-middle2. Barum Polaris 3 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Czech Republic (Barum) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Barum is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Barum winter tyres are slightly better rated (73%) than Falken (58%). But when it comes to comparing Barum Polaris 3 and Falken EuroWinter HS01, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Barum Polaris 3 was done in 2015, compared to 2017 when was the Falken EuroWinter HS01 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 195/65 R15 test, where both the Polaris 3 and the EuroWinter HS01 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Barum Polaris 3 has C wet grip rating, whereas 75% of Falken EuroWinter HS01 has B rating.
| # | Barum Polaris 3
| Falken EuroWinter HS01
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R18 | R13 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Upper-middle2. Barum Polaris 3 Lowcost
1. Barum Polaris 3 10.6
1. Barum Polaris 3 Exemplary2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Satisfactory
1. Barum Polaris 3 Satisfactory2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |||
| Barum Polaris 3 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2- | 2+ | 2- | |||
| Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2- | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,3 | 27 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 3 | 36,7 | 27,8 | |||||
| Falken EuroWinter HS01 | 36,2 | 28 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||