Comparison: Barum Polaris 3 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Yokohama W.drive V905

#	Barum Polaris 3 /0%	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 /0%	Yokohama W.drive V905 /0%	Add to comparison Make Model New comparison

Dimensions	R13 - R18	R14 - R21	R16 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Barum Polaris 3

/0%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

/0%

Yokohama W.drive V905

/0%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

New comparison

Dimensions

R13 - R18

R14 - R21

R16 - R19

Price

Set dimension to see prices

Remove

Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 Upper-middle

3. Barum Polaris 3 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 132

2. Barum Polaris 3 66

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 8

Number of tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 15x

2. Barum Polaris 3 10x

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 10x

Best position in test

1. Barum Polaris 3 3.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 4.

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 7.

Worst position in test

1. Barum Polaris 3 16.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 18.

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 24.

Average position in tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 7.87

2. Barum Polaris 3 10.6

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 14

Year of the last test

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 2019

2. Barum Polaris 3 2018

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 2018

Best rating in test

1. Barum Polaris 3 Exemplary

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

2. Barum Polaris 3 Satisfactory

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 Conditionally recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78.6%

Barum
Polaris 3

73.6%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

68.9%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 B

2. Barum Polaris 3 C

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

Barum
Polaris 3

87.3%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

77.4%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

74%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Barum
Polaris 3

79%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

76.6%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

71.8%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 C

2. Barum Polaris 3 F

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Barum
Polaris 3

79%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

59.4%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

49.6%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 71 dB

2. Barum Polaris 3 ?

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
W.drive V905

91.1%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

81.7%

Barum
Polaris 3

79%

Add to comparison

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Barum Polaris 3 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2	1-	2+
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Good	1-	2-	2	2+
Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	2	2-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
Barum Polaris 3	35,8	27,6
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	32,5	28,7
Yokohama W.drive V905	34,7	28,3
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2	2+	1
Barum Polaris 3 Rating: -	2	3+	2+	2+
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: -	2	3+	2+	1-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,2	25
Barum Polaris 3	37,2	26,1
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	38,5	25,9
Yokohama W.drive V905	39,9	26,9
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2016 185/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1,8	1,9	1,7	2,2	2,8	1	1,5
Barum Polaris 3 Rating: -	3,4	2,2	2,1	2,8	3,6	1,5	2,0
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: -	2,8	2,6	1,9	2,9	3,6	2,5	2,0
Show test details