Comparison: Barum Polaris 3 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Premium

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

3. Barum Polaris 3 Lowcost

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 76

3. Barum Polaris 3 66

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 23x

3. Barum Polaris 3 10x

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 1.

3. Barum Polaris 3 3.

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 7.

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

3. Barum Polaris 3 16.

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2.35

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

3. Barum Polaris 3 10.6

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2021

3. Barum Polaris 3 2018

1. Barum Polaris 3 Exemplary

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Very good

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Good

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

3. Barum Polaris 3 Satisfactory

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

91.6%

Barum
Polaris 3

73.6%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

70.3%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 B

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

3. Barum Polaris 3 C

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

93.2%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

90.5%

Barum
Polaris 3

87.3%

Barum
Polaris 3

79%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

79.4%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

75%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 C

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

3. Barum Polaris 3 F

Barum
Polaris 3

79%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

79.2%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

79.3%

1. Barum Polaris 3 ?

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 ?

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

Continental
WinterContact TS 860

84.2%

Barum
Polaris 3

79%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71.8%