• 14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Apollo Aspire XP vs. Falken Azenis FK510

Mutual tests overview

Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results

Tests used in comparison (2)

Organization Season Year Dimension Action
Autobild Autobild
Summer
2020 245/45 R18 View
Autobild Autobild
Summer
2019 225/45 R17 View

The Apollo Aspire XP and the Falken Azenis FK510 both are summer tyres that have undergone multiple tests to assess their performance. On our website, you will find in-depth analyses of these two models, and this comparison draws upon data from all tests to provide you with a comprehensive verdict.


The Apollo tyre is rated at 53% overall. It stands out in some categories during the tests carried out by Autobild, particularly in terms of its rolling resistance. The tyre also performed well in dry braking during the Gute-Fahrt test. Despite these strengths, it must be noted that the Apollo Aspire XP secures a 14th position out of 53 in Autobild's test and an 8th position from 10 in Gute-Fahrt's test. Overall, it's clear that while this tyre performs excellently in certain areas, it may not be the best choice when compared with other competitors.


In contrast, the Falken tyre boasts an overall rating of 79%. It is noteworthy that this model of tyre is manufactured in Japan and Turkey. In Autobild's test, this tyre impresses with its low exterior noise and especially with its price/value ratio, securing a solid 6th position out of 53. Furthermore, just like the Apollo, the Falken Azenis FK510 shows low rolling resistance. However, in the Gute-Fahrt test, it falls slightly short, landing in the 9th position out of 10.


It should be mentioned that the Falken Azenis FK510 model has been replaced by the newer Falken Azenis FK520, indicating progress and continuous improvement from the manufacturer.


In conclusion, when considering all test data, Falken Azenis FK510 is the superior tyre overall, bringing the benefits of lower exterior noise, excellent value for money, and advancements in the newer model. However, the Apollo Aspire XP displays noteworthy strengths such as dry braking and rolling resistance, suggesting it may still be a fitting choice for some drivers.

Performance comparison

Averaged from 2 tests

Wet Performance
Apollo Aspire XP
73%
Apollo
Aspire XP
Falken Azenis FK510
73%
Falken
Azenis FK510
Wet Braking
Apollo Aspire XP
47%
Falken Azenis FK510
64%
Wet Handling
Apollo Aspire XP
74%
Falken Azenis FK510
79%
Best: Nokian Wetproof (98.0%)
Wet Circle Cornering
Apollo Aspire XP
83%
Falken Azenis FK510
83%
Best: Nokian Wetproof (100.0%)
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Apollo Aspire XP
77%
Falken Azenis FK510
74%
Aquaplaning Cross
Apollo Aspire XP
82%
Falken Azenis FK510
66%
Best: Sava Intensa UHP 2 (100.0%)
Best in category: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 (92.8%)
Dry Performance
Apollo Aspire XP
80%
Apollo
Aspire XP
Falken Azenis FK510
66%
Falken
Azenis FK510
Dry Braking
Apollo Aspire XP
79%
Falken Azenis FK510
58%
Dry Handling
Apollo Aspire XP
80%
Falken Azenis FK510
73%
Best: Pirelli P ZERO (100.0%)
Best in category: Pirelli P ZERO (100.0%)
Comfort & Noise
Apollo Aspire XP
78%
Apollo
Aspire XP
Falken Azenis FK510
80%
Falken
Azenis FK510
Noise Exterior
Apollo Aspire XP
85%
Falken Azenis FK510
88%
Best: Nokian Wetproof (97.0%)
Ride Comfort
Apollo Aspire XP
71%
Falken Azenis FK510
71%
Best in category: Nokian Wetproof (97.0%)
Economy
Apollo Aspire XP
76%
Apollo
Aspire XP
Falken Azenis FK510
66%
Falken
Azenis FK510
Rolling Resistance
Apollo Aspire XP
84%
Falken Azenis FK510
79%
Mileage
Apollo Aspire XP
67%
Falken Azenis FK510
52%
Best in category: Continental PremiumContact 6 (91.5%)

Performance spider chart

Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Loading...

Add to comparison