• 12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Apollo Alnac 4G vs. Firestone Roadhawk

When comparing summer tyres, the Apollo Alnac 4G and Firestone Roadhawk both offer unique performances and characteristics.


The Apollo Alnac 4G, made by Apollo, rates a 46% in our tests, achieving its best position in the Autoklub ČR test: 14th out of 19. In the ADAC test, it landed a less impressive 27th place out of 50. According to an autobild 2024 review, the Alnac 4G is praised for its efficiency, however, it is criticized for its lack of balance, weaknesses on both dry and wet surfaces, poor environmental performance, and relatively low mileage and high wear.


On the other hand, the Firestone Roadhawk, produced by Firestone, scores a higher rating of 59% in our evaluations. It clinched 11th position in the Autoklub ČR test, and a more commendable 20th out of 50 in the ADAC test. This tyre shines in the autobild test, being marked as efficient, light, and well-performing on dry surfaces. However, its shortcomings are found in its unbalanced nature, poor performance on wet surfaces, and unsatisfactory mileage.


In a direct Autobild comparison, the Firestone Roadhawk clearly outperformed the Apollo Alnac 4G, achieving a 10th place compared to the Alnac's 21st out of 53. The Roadhawk was particularly noted for its dry and wet handling, as well as its wet side guide capabilities.


To summarize, the Firestone Roadhawk generally performs better in tests compared to the Apollo Alnac 4G. Its clear strengths lie in efficiency, lightness, and handling on dry surfaces, with minor weaknesses, while the Alnac 4G's greatest strength is its efficiency, but suffers from balancing issues and performance on different types of surfaces.


However, no new modelsreplace neither the Apollo Alnac 4G nor the Firestone Roadhawk, meaning that these versions remain the most up-to-date offerings from their respective manufacturers.


When choosing between these two summer tyres, prioritize your needs related to efficiency, road condition performance, and the importance of it being light.

Performance comparison

Wet Performance
Apollo Alnac 4G
78%
Apollo
Alnac 4G
Firestone Roadhawk
87%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Wet Braking
Apollo Alnac 4G
65%
Firestone Roadhawk
65%
Wet Handling
Apollo Alnac 4G
91%
Firestone Roadhawk
94%
Wet Circle Cornering
Apollo Alnac 4G
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
90%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Apollo Alnac 4G
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
94%
Best: Uniroyal RainSport 5 (100.0%)
Aquaplaning Cross
Apollo Alnac 4G
65%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Best: Vredestein Ultrac (100.0%)
Best in category: Vredestein Ultrac (92.6%)
Dry Performance
Apollo Alnac 4G
73%
Apollo
Alnac 4G
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Dry Braking
Apollo Alnac 4G
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
89%
Dry Handling
Apollo Alnac 4G
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
81%
Best in category: Continental PremiumContact 7 (99.0%)
Comfort & Noise
Apollo Alnac 4G
99%
Apollo
Alnac 4G
Firestone Roadhawk
93%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Noise Exterior
Apollo Alnac 4G
99%
Firestone Roadhawk
93%
Best: Nokian Wetproof (100.0%)
Best in category: Nokian Wetproof (100.0%)
Economy
Apollo Alnac 4G
61%
Apollo
Alnac 4G
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Rolling Resistance
Apollo Alnac 4G
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Best in category: Bridgestone Turanza T005 (100.0%)

Performance spider chart

Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Loading...

Add to comparison