Segment
1. Apollo Alnac 4G Winter Lowcost2. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Lowcost3. Viking WinTech Lowcost
Comparison: Apollo Alnac 4G Winter vs. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo vs. Viking WinTech
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Viking WinTech 20.83
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Viking WinTech Recommended3. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Viking WinTech Conditionally recommended3. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Apollo Alnac 4G Winter Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2 | 2 | |||
| GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 3 | 3+ | 3 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Apollo Alnac 4G Winter | 36.4 | 30.6 | |||||
| GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo | 36.0 | 29.3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
