Table of contents:
205/65 R16 Vredestein Wintrac variants
No
No
Vredestein Wintrac is a winter tyre made in total of 38 sizes, ranging from R15 to R15 - this particular dimension is R16, which means it fits to a 16 inch/406.4mm diameter wheel. 205/65 R16 is 40mm wider than the narrowest dimension (165) and 20mm narrower than the widest one (225). This tyre profile of 65 means the sidewall height of the tyre is 65% of the tyre width (205mm), which results in 133.25mm sidewall height. In 205/65 R16, there is only one possible speed index for Vredestein Wintrac - "H", which is good for speeds up to 210 km/h.
Vredestein Wintrac is made in 38 sizes, starting from 165/60 R15 up to 225/55 R16.
Similar tires
Vredestein Wintrac in tyre tests
Relevant tyre tests in same or similiar dimension (205/65 R16)
| Name | Winter | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1.6 | 1.9 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 2.9 | 1.7 | 2.0 |
| Vredestein Wintrac | 2.6 | 3.2 | 3.8 | 3.9 | 3.5 | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Show test details | |||||||
AUTOBILD Winter tyre test 2024 205/55 R16
good
Ranked #11 of 20
The Vredestein Wintrac secured the 11th position out of 20 competitors, earning a final rating of 'Good' for its performance. It impressed with its balanced handling and reliable driving dynamics in various weather conditions. Additionally, the tire demonstrated strong reserves in aquaplaning situations and boasted a low rolling resistance, which were significant positive aspects highlighted. However, it did have a slightly extended wet braking distance. Notably, it excelled in providing superior comfort compared to its peers.
good
Ranked #11 of 20
The Vredestein Wintrac secured the 11th position out of 20 competitors, earning a final rating of 'Good' for its performance. It impressed with its balanced handling and reliable driving dynamics in various weather conditions. Additionally, the tire demonstrated strong reserves in aquaplaning situations and boasted a low rolling resistance, which were significant positive aspects highlighted. However, it did have a slightly extended wet braking distance. Notably, it excelled in providing superior comfort compared to its peers.
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Vredestein Wintrac | 2 | 2- | 2 | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Vredestein Wintrac | 37.3 | 30.2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2 | 2.1 | |||||
| Vredestein Wintrac | 2.4 | 3.4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 27,3 | |||||
| Vredestein Wintrac | 33,5 | 30,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Wear | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | 1 | ||
| Vredestein Wintrac | 2+ | 2+ | 2- | 2+ | 3+ | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
