14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: tyres similar to Nokian WetProof

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

Looking for a comparison of Nokian WetProof to tyres that are made in similar dimensions? Here you can find detailed information based on tests, reviews and manufacturer's data.

#	Nokian WetProof /68%	BFGoodrich Advantage /66%	Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun /72%	Kumho Ecsta HS52 /73%	Uniroyal RainSport 5 /62%	Firestone Roadhawk /57%	Dunlop Sport BluResponse /67%	Fulda EcoControl HP2 /69%	Michelin e.Primacy /71%

Dimensions	R14 - R20	R14 - R20	R14 - R22	R14 - R18	R15 - R21	R15 - R21	R14 - R17	R15 - R18	R15 - R21
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove

The Nokian WetProof and BFGoodrich Advantage tyres are high-quality summer tyres that have proven their worth in various tests. Both tyres have distinct strengths and weaknesses which make them suitable for different types of drivers and conditions.

The Nokian WetProof tyre, manufactured in Finland, achieved an impressive 83% in our ratings. In the extensive ADAC tyre test, WetProof was ranked 11th out of 15, showing excellent noise reduction and wet circle cornering performance. Furthermore, in the Autozeitung test, it secured a commendable 6th position amongst 10 other high-quality tyres. The tyre further reinforces its prowess in wet conditions as it ranked 2nd in both GTÜ and Firmenauto tests. However, some areas need improvement such as its environmental balance, durability, and sustainability according to Autobild 2021.

BFGoodrich Advantage, on the other hand, received a rating of 76% from us, indicating high reliability and performance. In the ADAC test, BFGoodrich Advantage occupied the 9th position, wherein it outperformed many tyres in fuel efficiency - a crucial aspect for mileage-conscious drivers. However, in other tests like Autozeitung, GTÜ, and Firmenauto, it didn't fair as well, scoring 9th, 8th, and 8th positions respectively. Nonetheless, it redeemed its standing by performing admirably in dry handling in the Autobild test.

In conclusion, if you are seeking a tyre with notably less noise and superior wet-condition performance, the Nokian WetProof tyre might be your best bet. However, if fuel efficiency and dry handling take precedence, BFGoodrich Advantage could serve as an optimal choice. Both tyres are yet to be replaced by newer models and stand out with their longstanding reputation and consistent performance in various tests.

Remember to always assess the conditions and your individual needs when choosing a tyre. While test results and ratings are helpful, the best tyre for you depends significantly on your driving style and conditions.

Segment

1. Dunlop Sport BluResponse Premium

2. Michelin e.Primacy Premium

3. Nokian WetProof Upper-middle

4. BFGoodrich Advantage Upper-middle

5. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Upper-middle

6. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle

7. Uniroyal RainSport 5 Upper-middle

8. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle

9. Fulda EcoControl HP2 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Firestone Roadhawk 154

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 150

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 146

4. Uniroyal RainSport 5 124

5. Michelin e.Primacy 107

6. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89

7. Dunlop Sport BluResponse 70

8. Nokian WetProof 47

9. Fulda EcoControl HP2 30

Number of tests

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 23x

2. Firestone Roadhawk 21x

3. Dunlop Sport BluResponse 18x

4. Nokian WetProof 14x

5. BFGoodrich Advantage 13x

6. Uniroyal RainSport 5 13x

7. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

8. Fulda EcoControl HP2 8x

9. Michelin e.Primacy 4x

Best position in test

1. Nokian WetProof 1.

2. Dunlop Sport BluResponse 2.

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2.

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

5. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2.

6. Uniroyal RainSport 5 3.

7. Michelin e.Primacy 3.

8. Fulda EcoControl HP2 4.

9. BFGoodrich Advantage 8.

Worst position in test

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 15.

3. Nokian WetProof 17.

4. Fulda EcoControl HP2 20.

5. Dunlop Sport BluResponse 20.

6. BFGoodrich Advantage 24.

7. Firestone Roadhawk 31.

8. Uniroyal RainSport 5 36.

9. Michelin e.Primacy 38.

Average position in tests

1. Nokian WetProof 5.64

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 6.57

4. Dunlop Sport BluResponse 8.33

5. Firestone Roadhawk 11.9

6. Michelin e.Primacy 12

7. Fulda EcoControl HP2 12.75

8. BFGoodrich Advantage 13.62

9. Uniroyal RainSport 5 16.38

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 2025

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2025

3. Michelin e.Primacy 2025

4. Uniroyal RainSport 5 2025

5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

6. Dunlop Sport BluResponse 2023

7. Firestone Roadhawk 2023

8. Nokian WetProof 2023

9. Fulda EcoControl HP2 2022

Best rating in test

1. Dunlop Sport BluResponse Exemplary

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Exemplary

3. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary

4. Nokian WetProof Highly recommended

5. Michelin e.Primacy Very good

6. BFGoodrich Advantage Good

7. Uniroyal RainSport 5 Good

8. Fulda EcoControl HP2 Good

9. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good

Worst rating in test

1. Dunlop Sport BluResponse Good

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good

3. Nokian WetProof Recommended

4. Uniroyal RainSport 5 Satisfactory

5. Fulda EcoControl HP2 Satisfactory

6. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Still recommended

7. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended

8. Michelin e.Primacy Sufficient

9. BFGoodrich Advantage Sufficient

Wet

(Overall rating)

Uniroyal
RainSport 5

86%

Firestone
Roadhawk

85%

Nokian
WetProof

84%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

77%

Fulda
EcoControl HP2

75%

Dunlop
Sport BluResponse

70%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

68%

Michelin
e.Primacy

65%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

59%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Uniroyal RainSport 5 95%

2. Fulda EcoControl HP2 91%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 83%

4. Dunlop Sport BluResponse 83%

5. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 80%

6. Nokian WetProof 69%

7. Kumho Ecsta HS52 66%

8. Michelin e.Primacy 56%

9. BFGoodrich Advantage 46%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Uniroyal RainSport 5 94%

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 83%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 82%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 80%

5. Nokian WetProof 77%

6. Fulda EcoControl HP2 76%

7. Dunlop Sport BluResponse 75%

8. Michelin e.Primacy 68%

9. BFGoodrich Advantage 57%

Wet handling

1. Firestone Roadhawk 92%

2. Nokian WetProof 78%

3. Uniroyal RainSport 5 76%

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 63%

5. Fulda EcoControl HP2 62%

6. Dunlop Sport BluResponse 59%

7. BFGoodrich Advantage 55%

8. Kumho Ecsta HS52 0%

9. Michelin e.Primacy 0%

Wet braking

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 84%

2. Uniroyal RainSport 5 82%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 81%

4. Nokian WetProof 79%

5. Firestone Roadhawk 72%

6. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 72%

7. Michelin e.Primacy 70%

8. Dunlop Sport BluResponse 69%

9. Fulda EcoControl HP2 61%

Wet side guide

1. Firestone Roadhawk 96%

2. Nokian WetProof 90%

3. Uniroyal RainSport 5 88%

4. Fulda EcoControl HP2 79%

5. Dunlop Sport BluResponse 63%

6. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 59%

7. BFGoodrich Advantage 54%

8. Kumho Ecsta HS52 0%

9. Michelin e.Primacy 0%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Firestone Roadhawk A

2. Nokian WetProof A

3. Dunlop Sport BluResponse A

4. BFGoodrich Advantage A

5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 A

6. Fulda EcoControl HP2 B

7. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun B

8. Michelin e.Primacy B

9. Uniroyal RainSport 5 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

94%

Michelin
e.Primacy

94%

Firestone
Roadhawk

86%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

72%

Dunlop
Sport BluResponse

70%

Nokian
WetProof

68%

Fulda
EcoControl HP2

67%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

63%

Uniroyal
RainSport 5

57%

Dry braking

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 94%

2. Michelin e.Primacy 94%

3. Dunlop Sport BluResponse 81%

4. Nokian WetProof 80%

5. Firestone Roadhawk 80%

6. Fulda EcoControl HP2 79%

7. BFGoodrich Advantage 72%

8. Uniroyal RainSport 5 71%

9. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 66%

Dry handling

1. Firestone Roadhawk 92%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 77%

3. Nokian WetProof 72%

4. Fulda EcoControl HP2 67%

5. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 64%

6. Dunlop Sport BluResponse 59%

7. Uniroyal RainSport 5 51%

8. Kumho Ecsta HS52 0%

9. Michelin e.Primacy 0%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Michelin
e.Primacy

91%

Dunlop
Sport BluResponse

82%

Uniroyal
RainSport 5

80%

Fulda
EcoControl HP2

77%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

75%

Nokian
WetProof

74%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

71%

Firestone
Roadhawk

66%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

65%

Exterior noise

1. Michelin e.Primacy 91%

2. Nokian WetProof 79%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 75%

4. Uniroyal RainSport 5 76%

5. Fulda EcoControl HP2 75%

6. Dunlop Sport BluResponse 73%

7. Firestone Roadhawk 68%

8. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 65%

9. BFGoodrich Advantage 60%

Comfort

1. Dunlop Sport BluResponse 91%

2. Uniroyal RainSport 5 82%

3. Fulda EcoControl HP2 73%

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 66%

5. BFGoodrich Advantage 66%

6. Firestone Roadhawk 64%

7. Nokian WetProof 53%

8. Michelin e.Primacy 0%

9. Kumho Ecsta HS52 0%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Fulda EcoControl HP2 70 dB

2. Dunlop Sport BluResponse ?

3. Uniroyal RainSport 5 ?

4. Firestone Roadhawk ?

5. Nokian WetProof ?

6. Michelin e.Primacy ?

7. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ?

8. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun ? dB

9. BFGoodrich Advantage ? dB

Costs

(Overall rating)

Michelin
e.Primacy

100%

Fulda
EcoControl HP2

79%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

79%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

74%

Uniroyal
RainSport 5

64%

Dunlop
Sport BluResponse

63%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

63%

Nokian
WetProof

60%

Firestone
Roadhawk

58%

Rolling resistance

1. Dunlop Sport BluResponse 88%

2. Fulda EcoControl HP2 71%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 70%

4. Nokian WetProof 67%

5. Firestone Roadhawk 63%

6. Uniroyal RainSport 5 46%

7. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 34%

8. Michelin e.Primacy 0%

9. Kumho Ecsta HS52 0%

Mileage

1. Michelin e.Primacy 100%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

3. Fulda EcoControl HP2 78%

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 73%

5. BFGoodrich Advantage 66%

6. Firestone Roadhawk 61%

7. Uniroyal RainSport 5 59%

8. Dunlop Sport BluResponse 60%

9. Nokian WetProof 53%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Michelin e.Primacy A

2. Dunlop Sport BluResponse B

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 C

4. Fulda EcoControl HP2 C

5. BFGoodrich Advantage C

6. Firestone Roadhawk C

7. Nokian WetProof C

8. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun E

9. Uniroyal RainSport 5 ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

ADAC Summer tyre test 2023 205/55 R16

Name	Enviromental impact	Driving safety
Best values in test	1,3	1,8
Nokian Wetproof Rating: Good	2,9	2,0
BFGoodrich Advantage Rating: Good	2,8	2,9
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Rating: Good	2,7	2,1
Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Good	2,7	2,3
Uniroyal RainSport 5 Rating: Good	3,1	3,4
Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Good	2,7	2,8
Dunlop Sport BluResponse Rating: Good	2,8	2,6
Fulda EcoControl HP2 Rating: Good	2,2	2,8
Michelin e.Primacy Rating: Sufficient	1,3	3,9
Show test details

Autozeitung Summer tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Wet	Dry
Best values in test	146	134
Nokian Wetproof Rating: Good	124	114
BFGoodrich Advantage Rating: Sufficient	108	108
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Rating: Satisfactory	120	104
Show test details

GTÜ Summer tyre test 2021 225/45 R17

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Enviromental impact	Running costs
Best values in test	157	68	54	22	20
Nokian WetProof Rating: Highly recommended	153	66	50	19	18
BFGoodrich Advantage Rating: Recommended	144	58	50	19	17
Show test details

Firmenauto Summer tyre test 2021 195/55 R16

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	8,9	8,9	8,7	10	10
Nokian WetProof Rating: Good	8,2	8,5	7,6	7	10
BFGoodrich Advantage Rating: Satisfactory	7,6	8,0	7,5	7	7
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Rating: Satisfactory	7,0	7,8	6,9	3	7
Show test details

Autobild Summer tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2+	1
Nokian WetProof Rating: Satisfactory	2	2	3
BFGoodrich Advantage Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2+	2-
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2	2
Uniroyal RainSport 5 Rating: Satisfactory	2+	2-	2-
Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Good	2+	2+	3
Dunlop Sport BluResponse Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2	3+
Fulda EcoControl HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2	2
Show test details

Autobild Summer tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	34,1	29,6
Nokian Wetproof	35,1	31,7
BFGoodrich Advantage	36,7	31,9
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun	35,8	31,4
Uniroyal RainSport 5	37,4	32,0
Firestone Roadhawk	35,7	31,6
Dunlop Sport BluResponse	35,4	32,2
Fulda EcoControl HP2	36,0	33,8
Show test details

ADAC Summer tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Noise	Wear
Best values in test	1,8	1,4	2,7	0,6
Nokian WetProof Rating: Satisfactory	2,3	2,1	2,7	3,0
BFGoodrich Advantage Rating: Satisfactory	2,9	2,2	2,8	2,0
Uniroyal Rainsport 5 Rating: Satisfactory	2,1	2,9	2,7	3,0
Fulda EcoControl HP2 Rating: Satisfactory	2,8	2,5	2,7	1,5
Show test details

Comparison: tyres similar to Nokian WetProof

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands