• 14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: tyres similar to Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Looking for a comparison of Kleber Dynaxer HP4 to tyres that are made in similar dimensions? Here you can find detailed information based on tests, reviews and manufacturer's data.

# Kleber Dynaxer HP4
/74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
/66%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
/91%
Continental EcoContact 6
/48%
Matador MP47 Hectorra 3
/39%
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
/29%
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
/0%
Uniroyal RainExpert 3
/0%
Michelin Energy Saver+
/0%

Add to comparison

Kleber
BFGoodrich
Bridgestone
Continental
Matador
Barum
Kleber
Uniroyal
Michelin
DimensionsR14 - R17 R14 - R20 R14 - R22 R13 - R22 R13 - R20 R14 - R21 R14 - R19 R13 - R16 R14 - R16
Price
Remove

When weighing the benefits between the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 and the BFGoodrich Advantage, it's clear these summer tyres offer unique strengths and corresponding weaknesses.


The Kleber Dynaxer HP4, by Kleber, scored slightly higher in our internal rating system at 82%. In the Autobild test, the tyre positioned 14th out of 53 tested tyres. While the top features of this model are comfort and exterior noise, it performs poorly in wet conditions as stated by Autobild 2024. Furthermore, this tyres is weaker when it comes to grip on wet surfaces and its response to steering on a dry track can be noticeably delayed.


The BFGoodrich Advantage, by BFGoodrich is another summer tyre option. With a rating of 76%, it came in 18th place in the Autobild test. The strength of this tyre appears to be in the comfort and dry handling, even offering dynamic dry handling and a reduced rolling resistance. However, BFGoodrich Advantage tends to understeer in wet conditions and has a comparatively longer braking distance when exposed to moisture.


In the ADAC test of 50 tyres, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 secured the 12th position, once again outperforming the BFGoodrich Advantage which came in at the 21st position.


Neither tyres have been replaced with a newer model. Given their performances in our tests and various others, Kleber Dynaxer HP4 appears to be the overall better performing tyre, yet the BFGoodrich Advantage certainly has its advantages and can be a cost-effective option given its reduced rolling resistance and lower price. However, for drivers regularly exposed to wet driving conditions, both tyres may not provide the best solution for handling and safety.

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild
Name
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
Rating: Good
BFGoodrich Advantage
Rating: Good
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test35,425,8
Kleber Dynaxer HP437,428,8
BFGoodrich Advantage37,429,1
Show test details
ADAC
Name Enviromental impactDriving safety
Best values in test1,31,8
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
Rating: Good
2,12,8
BFGoodrich Advantage
Rating: Good
2,82,9
Bridgestone Turanza T005
Rating: Good
2,42,2
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
Rating: Good
2,93,2
Show test details
Autobild
Name WetDryRunning costs
Best values in test12+1+
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
Rating: Satisfactory
2-23+
BFGoodrich Advantage
Rating: Good
2-2+ 2-
Bridgestone Turanza T005
Rating: Good
1 2+ 2-
Continental EcoContact 6
Rating: Satisfactory
2-23+
Show test details
Autobild
Name WetDryRunning costs
Best values in test1-2+1
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
Rating: Satisfactory
2-22-
BFGoodrich Advantage
Rating: Satisfactory
2-2+ 2-
Bridgestone Turanza T005
Rating: Exemplary
222-
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test34,129,6
Kleber Dynaxer HP436,231,6
BFGoodrich Advantage36,731,9
Bridgestone Turanza T00535,431,6
Barum Bravuris 5 HM39,033,6
Show test details