Segment
2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium6. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle7. Uniroyal WinterExpert Upper-middle8. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Upper-middle9. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 Lowcost
Looking for a comparison of Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 to tyres that are made in similar dimensions? Here you can find detailed information based on tests, reviews and manufacturer's data.
2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium6. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle7. Uniroyal WinterExpert Upper-middle8. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Upper-middle9. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 Lowcost
9. Uniroyal WinterExpert 11.25
1. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 Exemplary2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Highly recommended3. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Highly recommended4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Test winner5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good6. Continental WinterContact TS 870 Very good7. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good9. Uniroyal WinterExpert Satisfactory
6. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Recommended7. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Satisfactory8. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended9. Uniroyal WinterExpert Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 7 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Wear | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | 1 | ||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: Good | 1- | 2 | 1- | 2 | 2+ | ||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good | 1- | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2+ | ||
| Continental WinterContact TS 870 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 1- | 2+ | 1 | ||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 3+ | 1- | 3+ | 2 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 27,3 | |||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | 33,4 | 28,2 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 32,1 | 28,1 | |||||
| Continental WinterContact TS 870 | 34,2 | 27,7 | |||||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 35,6 | 27,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on ice | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 13,9 | 14,8 | 16,4 | ||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | 14,6 | 15,8 | 22 | ||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 15,4 | 16,4 | 21,7 | ||||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 15,1 | 15,9 | 23,3 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Points total | Winter | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 101,6 | 299,9 | 299,9 | 100 | 101,1 | 100,7 | |
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | 99,3 | 294,4 | 297,6 | 96,2 | 79,6 | 98,1 | |
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 100 | 285,8 | 299,8 | 100 | 87,6 | 99,8 | |
| Continental WinterContact TS 870 | 101,6 | 299,9 | 299,9 | 93,8 | 101,1 | 100,7 | |
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,1 | 2,5 | 1,0 | 1,8 |
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: Good | 2,0 | 2,5 | 2,1 | 2,4 | 3,2 | 2,0 | 1,9 |
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good | 1,3 | 2,1 | 2,1 | 2,4 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 2,0 |
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: Good | 2- | 2- | 1 | 2 | |||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good | 2+ | 2- | 1- | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | 32 | 24,9 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 29,2 | 24,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||