• 12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: tyres similar to Firestone Roadhawk

Looking for a comparison of Firestone Roadhawk to tyres that are made in similar dimensions? Here you can find detailed information based on tests, reviews and manufacturer's data.

# Firestone Roadhawk
/57%
Uniroyal RainSport 5
/64%
BFGoodrich Advantage
/62%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
/67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
/74%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
/51%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
/83%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
/72%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
/77%

Add to comparison

Firestone
Uniroyal
BFGoodrich
Falken
Firestone
Semperit
Kumho
Hankook
Bridgestone
DimensionsR15 - R21 R15 - R21 R14 - R20 R14 - R22 R16 - R22 R15 - R21 R16 - R22 R13 - R23 R16 - R22
Price
Remove

We will be comparing two summer tyres, the Firestone Roadhawk and Uniroyal RainSport 5, both rated 72% by our experts. We aim to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of each model to assist you in your tyre decisions.


The Firestone Roadhawk is a product of Firestone, a company renowned for its traction and durability in tyres. It has proven to excel particularly in relation to dry handling and wet side guide, giving it an edge for summer use. Interestingly, in the Autobild test, the Firestone Roadhawk positioned 10th out of 53 tested tyres. Notable pros include sporty and dynamic handling, short dry braking distances and a good price-performance ratio. Conversely, the tyre has a slightly increased rolling noise, as noted in Autobild 2019 and 2024 test summaries.


On the other hand, the Uniroyal RainSport 5 by Uniroyal, performs exceptionally well under aquaplaning conditions both longitudinal and cross. However, tests indicate that it exhibits a somewhat spongy ride behaviour and limited side guidance on dry surfaces. It gained the 5th position out of 19 tyres in 'Autoklub ČR' test and 19th out of 53 in Autobild test. Additional pros include good aquaplaning qualities and safe wet handling. But on the downside, the tyre has been marked down for its handling on dry surfaces, effectiveness and sustainability, low tread life and high fuel consumption according to 'autoklubcr 2023' summary.


Based on the data supplied, both tyres deliver strong performances in specific areas. The Firestone Roadhawk demonstrates consistency in handling under both dry and wet conditions, while the Uniroyal RainSport 5 excels under aquaplaning conditions. However, the overall position in tests slightly tilt in favor of the Firestone Roadhawk due to lower noise and better performance on dry surfaces.


In conclusion, depending on your driving conditions and priorities, either the noise efficiency, better performance on dry conditions and value of the Firestone Roadhawk, or the Uniroyal RainSport 5's excellence in aquaplaning conditions could make each an appealing option.

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 8 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

8

Mutual tests

Autobild
Name
Firestone Roadhawk
Rating: Good
Uniroyal RainSport 5
Rating: Satisfactory
BFGoodrich Advantage
Rating: Good
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Rating: Good
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Rating: Good
Bridgestone Turanza 6
Rating: Exemplary
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test35,425,8
Firestone Roadhawk36,628,7
Uniroyal RainSport 537,927,7
BFGoodrich Advantage37,429,1
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun36,528,0
Semperit Speed-Life 339,028,8
Hankook Ventus Prime 435,927,7
Bridgestone Turanza 636,927,9
Show test details
Autoklub ČR
Name Points totalWetDry
Best values in test104,7106103,4
Firestone Roadhawk100100100
Uniroyal RainSport 5101,5104,498,6
Semperit Speed-Life 3100,6102,598,6
Hankook Ventus Prime 4101100,6101,4
Show test details
ADAC
Name Enviromental impactDriving safety
Best values in test1,31,8
Firestone Roadhawk
Rating: Good
2,72,8
Uniroyal RainSport 5
Rating: Good
3,13,4
BFGoodrich Advantage
Rating: Good
2,82,9
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Rating: Good
2,72,1
Semperit Speed-Life 3
Rating: Good
2,62,8
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Rating: Good
2,72,4
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test58.124.8
Firestone Roadhawk67.730.9
Uniroyal RainSport 563.926.5
Semperit Speed-Life 371.231.3
Kumho Ecsta PS7161.726.6
Bridgestone Turanza 663.827.6
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test35,727,5
Firestone Roadhawk37,732,8
Uniroyal RainSport 538,433,5
BFGoodrich Advantage36,331
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun36,128,2
Semperit Speed-Life 34033,1
Hankook Ventus Prime 435,827,8
Show test details
Autobild
Name WetDryRunning costs
Best values in test1-2+1
Firestone Roadhawk
Rating: Good
2+2+ 3
Uniroyal RainSport 5
Rating: Satisfactory
2+2-2-
BFGoodrich Advantage
Rating: Satisfactory
2-2+ 2-
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Rating: Satisfactory
2-22
Semperit Speed-Life 3
Rating: Exemplary
1- 2-2
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test34,129,6
Firestone Roadhawk35,731,6
Uniroyal RainSport 537,432,0
BFGoodrich Advantage36,731,9
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun35,831,4
Semperit Speed-Life 337,730,0
Show test details