• 14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: tyres similar to Firestone Multiseason 2

Looking for a comparison of Firestone Multiseason 2 to tyres that are made in similar dimensions? Here you can find detailed information based on tests, reviews and manufacturer's data.

# Firestone Multiseason 2
/55%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
/49%
Falken EuroALL Season AS210
/48%
Continental AllSeasonContact
/58%
Dunlop All Season 2
/66%
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
/79%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
/87%
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
/88%
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
/90%

Add to comparison

Firestone
Kumho
Falken
Continental
Dunlop
GoodYear
Hankook
Continental
Bridgestone
DimensionsR13 - R19 R13 - R20 R13 - R20 R13 - R20 R14 - R20 R14 - R21 R14 - R20 R15 - R22 R16 - R21
Price
Remove



The Firestone Multiseason 2 and the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S are two tyres that have been tested extensively for their performance under various conditions. We will compare these two models and share with you the strengths and weaknesses of each.


The Firestone Multiseason 2 is a winter tyre made in Italy. It scored a 67% in our test and notably offers short braking distances on snow and in wet conditions, high mileage and low rolling resistance which were its best features in Autobild's tests. However, it falls behind in terms of snow cornering grip, reserve in curve aquaplaning and has an extended dry braking distance. Although it finished 6th in the Autobild test (out of 32), these are areas where there is potential for improvement. More about Firestone tyres here.


On the other hand, the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S which is an allround tyre made in China, has a higher overall rating of 73% in our test. Best features such as low exterior noise, snow traction and braking, and value for money helped this tyre secure the 10th position in the Autobild test. However, it does have a downside such as mediocre aquaplaning characteristics and being subject to slightly extended braking distances on both dry and wet conditions, alongside a higher rolling resistance. More about Kumho tyres here.


In a head-to-head comparison, the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S seems to perform better overall in the tests. While the Firestone Multiseason 2 does have compelling features like the ability to provide a high mileage and a good price/value ratio, it's the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S' better overall performance and lower noise levels that gives it an edge. However, it's important to choose a tyre that meets your specific needs and driving conditions.


In conclusion, both tyres have their strengths and weaknesses, and the selection should be based on specific preferences and needs. Some may prioritize noise levels while others may focus more on snow traction or the longevity of the tyre.

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 8 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

8

Mutual tests

Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test37.745
Firestone Multiseason 241.847.9
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S41.449.8
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-341.848.3
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H75041.349.5
Continental AllSeasonContact 240.445.4
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 638.545
Show test details
Autobild
Name
Firestone Multiseason 2
Rating: Satisfactory
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
Rating: Satisfactory
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
Rating: Good
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Rating: Good
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
Rating: Exemplary
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
Rating: Exemplary
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test39,944,4
Firestone Multiseason 245,948,9
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S44,451,9
Falken EuroALL Season AS21044,451,6
Continental AllSeasonContact45,848,9
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-343,946,8
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H75042,148
Show test details
Autobild
Name WetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in test1-2+1-1
Firestone Multiseason 2
Rating: Satisfactory
23+22+
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
Rating: Good
2-2-2+2+
Falken EuroALL Season AS210
Rating: Good
2-2-22+
Continental AllSeasonContact
Rating: Satisfactory
23+1- 3
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
Rating: Satisfactory
1- 21- 2+
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Rating: Good
22+ 1- 3+
Show test details
Autobild
Name WetDrySnowRolling resistanceWear
Best values in test2+1-2+11
Firestone Multiseason 2
Rating: Satisfactory
3+2-2+ 22
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
Rating: Satisfactory
3+2221
Falken EuroALL Season AS210
Rating: Satisfactory
2+ 2232+
Continental AllSeasonContact
Rating: Exemplary
222+ 2+2
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
Rating: Test winner
2+ 22+ 21-
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Rating: Good
22223
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test37,650
Firestone Multiseason 242,454,1
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S41,554,4
Falken EuroALL Season AS21042,250,8
Continental AllSeasonContact42,353
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-341,950,7
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H75040,352,3
Show test details
Autobild
Name WetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in test12+11
Firestone Multiseason 2
Rating: Good
22+ 2+1
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
Rating: Satisfactory
222+3
Falken EuroALL Season AS210
Rating: Exemplary
2221-
Continental AllSeasonContact
Rating: Exemplary
2+21-1-
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
Rating: Test winner
1-2+ 1-1
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Rating: Good
1 2+ 2+3+
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test39,745
Firestone Multiseason 241,249,3
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S44,349,3
Falken EuroALL Season AS21042,751,3
Continental AllSeasonContact4348,6
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-341,647
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H75041,147,2
Show test details