14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: tyres similar to Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

Looking for a comparison of Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun to tyres that are made in similar dimensions? Here you can find detailed information based on tests, reviews and manufacturer's data.

#	Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun /67%	BFGoodrich Advantage /67%	Kumho Ecsta HS52 /69%	Bridgestone Turanza T005 /88%	Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance /38%	Kleber Dynaxer HP3 /0%	Continental EcoContact 6 /0%	Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 /0%	Michelin Primacy 3 /0%

Dimensions	R14 - R22	R14 - R20	R14 - R20	R14 - R23	R14 - R20	R14 - R19	R13 - R24	R15 - R20	R15 - R20
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove

Today, we compare two summer tyres: Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun by Falken and BFGoodrich Advantage by BFGoodrich.

The Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun, a touring tyre made in Turkey, delivers a solid performance with an overall rating of 81%. Key strengths found among the test data include exceptional dry handling, good comfort, and impressive aquaplaning resistance. Despite slight weaknesses in environmental sustainability and efficiency shown in autobild 2024 test, this Falken tyre ranked 8th in the Autobild and Autozeitung tests out of 53 and 10 total tyres respectively and 6th in the ADAC test out of 50 tyres.

On the other hand, the BFGoodrich Advantage presented commendable comfort and dry handling but did not fare as well overall, with an overall score of 76%. While praised for its dynamic dry handling, low noise, and reasonable price in autobild 2024, it was noted for a tendency to understeer in wet conditions. In terms of test placement, it ranked as the 18th tyre in Autobild test out of 53, 21st in ADAC out of 50 tyres, and 9th in Autozeitung test out of 10 total tyres. It did surpass the Falken tyre in the Firmenauto test, bagging the 8th position out of 11.

When comparing Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun and BFGoodrich Advantage, the ZE310 Ecorun takes the lead in most of the tests thanks to its superior wet and dry handling capabilities. Its key shortcomings were environmental and logistical considerations, namely increased rolling resistance and lower than average sustainability. The BFGoodrich Advantage competes well in terms of comfort and lower rolling resistance but falls behind in wet condition handling.

In conclusion, if dry and wet handling are paramount for you, then you might lean towards the Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun. If comfort and cost-effectiveness are important considerations, then the BFGoodrich Advantage would be a suitable choice. Do bear in mind that neither of these tyres had a newer model replacing them at the time of writing. Be sure to check back for updates and more detailed individual tyre tests.

Segment

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Premium

3. Continental EcoContact 6 Premium

4. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium

5. Michelin Primacy 3 Premium

6. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Upper-middle

7. BFGoodrich Advantage Upper-middle

8. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle

9. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Continental EcoContact 6 676

2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 658

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 194

4. Michelin Primacy 3 182

5. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 161

6. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 153

7. BFGoodrich Advantage 146

8. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 128

9. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

Number of tests

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 33x

2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 23x

3. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 22x

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 16x

5. BFGoodrich Advantage 13x

6. Michelin Primacy 3 10x

7. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

8. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 6x

9. Continental EcoContact 6 5x

Best position in test

1. Michelin Primacy 3 1.

2. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 1.

3. Bridgestone Turanza T005 1.

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

5. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2.

6. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 3.

7. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 4.

8. Continental EcoContact 6 7.

9. BFGoodrich Advantage 8.

Worst position in test

1. Michelin Primacy 3 10.

2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 11.

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 12.

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

5. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 14.

6. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 15.

7. Continental EcoContact 6 23.

8. BFGoodrich Advantage 24.

9. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 45.

Average position in tests

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 4.09

2. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 4.91

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 5.5

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

5. Michelin Primacy 3 6.1

6. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 6.57

7. Continental EcoContact 6 13

8. BFGoodrich Advantage 13.62

9. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 19

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 2025

2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 2025

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 2025

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

5. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2023

6. Continental EcoContact 6 2022

7. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 2022

8. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 2020

9. Michelin Primacy 3 2018

Best rating in test

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Exemplary

2. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Exemplary

3. Michelin Primacy 3 Exemplary

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Exemplary

5. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Exemplary

6. BFGoodrich Advantage Good

7. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good

8. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 Satisfactory

9. Continental EcoContact 6 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Good

2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Good

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good

4. Michelin Primacy 3 Recommended

5. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 Satisfactory

6. Continental EcoContact 6 Satisfactory

7. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Still recommended

8. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Conditionally recommended

9. BFGoodrich Advantage Sufficient

Wet

(Overall rating)

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance

80.7%

Bridgestone
Turanza T005

79%

Hankook
Ventus Prime3 K125

79%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

74%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

71%

Kleber
Dynaxer HP3

70%

Michelin
Primacy 3

69.6%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

59%

Continental
EcoContact 6

48%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 82%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 74%

3. Bridgestone Turanza T005 69%

4. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 66%

5. BFGoodrich Advantage 62%

6. Continental EcoContact 6 57%

7. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 0%

8. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 0%

9. Michelin Primacy 3 0%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 82%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 69%

3. Bridgestone Turanza T005 69%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 63%

5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 61%

6. Continental EcoContact 6 51%

7. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 0%

8. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 0%

9. Michelin Primacy 3 0%

Wet handling

1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 85%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 84%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 74%

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 68%

5. BFGoodrich Advantage 56%

6. Continental EcoContact 6 46%

7. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 0%

8. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 0%

9. Michelin Primacy 3 0%

Wet braking

1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 96%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 88%

3. Bridgestone Turanza T005 81%

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 77%

5. BFGoodrich Advantage 69%

6. Continental EcoContact 6 42%

7. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 0%

8. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 0%

9. Michelin Primacy 3 0%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 A

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 A

3. Bridgestone Turanza T005 A

4. BFGoodrich Advantage A

5. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance A

6. Michelin Primacy 3 A

7. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun B

8. Continental EcoContact 6 B

9. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Ventus Prime3 K125

94%

Kleber
Dynaxer HP3

87.7%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

85%

Bridgestone
Turanza T005

83%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance

83.1%

Michelin
Primacy 3

82.5%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

69%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

67%

Continental
EcoContact 6

65%

Dry handling

1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 92%

2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 86%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 79%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 80%

5. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 76%

6. Continental EcoContact 6 51%

7. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 0%

8. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 0%

9. Michelin Primacy 3 0%

Dry braking

1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 95%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 91%

3. Continental EcoContact 6 79%

4. Bridgestone Turanza T005 76%

5. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 72%

6. BFGoodrich Advantage 67%

7. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 0%

8. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 0%

9. Michelin Primacy 3 0%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Continental
EcoContact 6

91%

Michelin
Primacy 3

85%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

76%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance

76.7%

Hankook
Ventus Prime3 K125

73%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

70%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

70%

Bridgestone
Turanza T005

61%

Kleber
Dynaxer HP3

57.6%

Exterior noise

1. Continental EcoContact 6 95%

2. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 81%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 74%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 70%

5. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 69%

6. Bridgestone Turanza T005 61%

7. Michelin Primacy 3 0%

8. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 0%

9. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 0%

Comfort

1. Continental EcoContact 6 86%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 76%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 72%

4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 72%

5. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 64%

6. Bridgestone Turanza T005 60%

7. Michelin Primacy 3 0%

8. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 0%

9. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 0%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 69 dB

2. Michelin Primacy 3 71 dB

3. Continental EcoContact 6 ?

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ?

5. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 ?

6. Bridgestone Turanza T005 ?

7. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 ?

8. BFGoodrich Advantage ? dB

9. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun ? dB

Offroad

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Ventus Prime3 K125

94%

Bridgestone
Turanza T005

81.9%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

72.3%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance

0%

Michelin
Primacy 3

0%

Continental
EcoContact 6

0%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

0%

Kleber
Dynaxer HP3

0%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

0%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Michelin
Primacy 3

85%

Continental
EcoContact 6

83%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

77%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance

73.2%

Bridgestone
Turanza T005

71%

Kleber
Dynaxer HP3

68.8%

Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

65%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

65%

Hankook
Ventus Prime3 K125

56%

Rolling resistance

1. Continental EcoContact 6 100%

2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 96%

3. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 71%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 71%

5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 63%

6. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 46%

7. Michelin Primacy 3 0%

8. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 0%

9. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 0%

Mileage

1. Continental EcoContact 6 77%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 71%

3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun 67%

4. Bridgestone Turanza T005 64%

5. BFGoodrich Advantage 60%

6. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 46%

7. Michelin Primacy 3 0%

8. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 0%

9. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 0%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Continental EcoContact 6 A

2. Bridgestone Turanza T005 B

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance B

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 C

5. BFGoodrich Advantage C

6. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 C

7. Michelin Primacy 3 C

8. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun E

9. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 9 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Summer tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Rating: Good
BFGoodrich Advantage Rating: Good
Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Good
Show test details

Autobild Summer tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	35,4	25,8
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun	36,5	28,0
BFGoodrich Advantage	37,4	29,1
Kumho Ecsta HS52	35,4	26,1
Show test details

ADAC Summer tyre test 2023 205/55 R16

Name	Enviromental impact	Driving safety
Best values in test	1,3	1,8
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Rating: Good	2,7	2,1
BFGoodrich Advantage Rating: Good	2,8	2,9
Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Good	2,7	2,3
Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Good	2,4	2,2
Show test details

Autobild Summer tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Running costs
Best values in test	1	2+	1+
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Rating: Good	1-	2+	2-
BFGoodrich Advantage Rating: Good	2-	2+	2-
Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Good	2	2	2
Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Good	1	2+	2-
Continental EcoContact 6 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2	3+
Show test details

Autozeitung Summer tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Wet	Dry
Best values in test	146	134
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Rating: Satisfactory	120	104
BFGoodrich Advantage Rating: Sufficient	108	108
Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Highly recommended	137	127
Continental EcoContact 6 Rating: Good	101	134
Show test details

Autobild Summer tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	35,7	27,5
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun	36,1	28,2
BFGoodrich Advantage	36,3	31
Kumho Ecsta HS52	35,7	28,6
Bridgestone Turanza T005	35,8	27,5
Continental EcoContact 6	36,4	32,7
Show test details

Firmenauto Summer tyre test 2021 195/55 R16

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	8,9	8,9	8,7	10	10
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Rating: Satisfactory	7,0	7,8	6,9	3	7
BFGoodrich Advantage Rating: Satisfactory	7,6	8,0	7,5	7	7
Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Good	8,1	8,1	8,0	10	6
Show test details

Autobild Summer tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2+	1
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2	2
BFGoodrich Advantage Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2+	2-
Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Exemplary	2	2	2-
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Good	1-	1-	3+
Show test details

Autobild Summer tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	34,1	29,6
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun	35,8	31,4
BFGoodrich Advantage	36,7	31,9
Bridgestone Turanza T005	35,4	31,6
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125	34,1	29,6
Show test details

Comparison: tyres similar to Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands