• 14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: tyres similar to Falken EuroALL Season AS210

Looking for a comparison of Falken EuroALL Season AS210 to tyres that are made in similar dimensions? Here you can find detailed information based on tests, reviews and manufacturer's data.

# Falken EuroALL Season AS210
/61%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
/64%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
/88%
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2
/0%
Continental AllSeasonContact
/83%
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
/80%
Nexen N Blue 4 Season
/33%
Firestone Multiseason 2
/58%
Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
/61%

Add to comparison

Falken
Kumho
Hankook
Goodyear
Continental
GoodYear
Nexen
Firestone
Bridgestone
DimensionsR13 - R20 R13 - R20 R14 - R20 R13 - R20 R13 - R20 R14 - R21 R13 - R19 R13 - R19 R15 - R21
Price
Remove

In this article, we will compare two all-season tyres: the Falken EuroALL Season AS210 and the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S. Both tyres are designed to provide good performance throughout the year, and they have been tested in various conditions to determine their strengths and weaknesses.


Starting with the Falken EuroALL Season AS210, this tyre has an our rating of 84%. It is made in Turkey and is designed for all-round use. According to several tests conducted by Autobild and Automotorsport, the tyre's main strengths are its good traction and short braking distances on snow, high mileage, and secure aquaplaning qualities. On the flip side, it has some weaknesses, such as slight understeering in snowy and wet conditions, high rolling resistance, and extended dry braking distances.


On the other hand, the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S has an our rating of 76% and is made in China. This tyre is also designed for all-round use. In the same tests conducted by Autobild, the Kumho tyre's main strengths include good snow braking, stable dry handling, high mileage, good value for money, and low exterior noise. However, it is not without its weaknesses, which include slightly extended wet and dry braking distances, average aquaplaning reserves, and mediocre comfort.


In a mutual test conducted by Autobild, the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S ranked 10th out of 32 total tyres, while the Falken EuroALL Season AS210 came in at 11th place. This shows that both tyres are quite close in their overall performance, with the Kumho tyre having a slight edge according to the test results.


In summary, the Falken EuroALL Season AS210 and Kumho HA32 Solus 4S both offer good all-round performance, with each tyre having its own strengths and weaknesses. Depending on your driving needs and preferences, one tyre may be better suited for you than the other. Based on the test results, the Kumho tyre may be a better option if you prioritize snow braking and low noise levels, while the Falken may be the better choice if you value high mileage and aquaplaning properties. However, due to their close test rankings, both tyres should provide a reliable and safe driving experience throughout the year.

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test39,944,4
Falken EuroALL Season AS21044,451,6
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S44,451,9
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H75042,148
Continental AllSeasonContact45,848,9
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-343,946,8
Nexen N Blue 4 Season43,754,5
Firestone Multiseason 245,948,9
Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO41,444,4
Show test details
Autobild
Name WetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in test1-2+1-1
Falken EuroALL Season AS210
Rating: Good
2-2-22+
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
Rating: Good
2-2-2+2+
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Rating: Good
22+ 1- 3+
Continental AllSeasonContact
Rating: Satisfactory
23+1- 3
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
Rating: Satisfactory
1- 21- 2+
Nexen N Blue 4 Season
Rating: Satisfactory
3+3+2+1
Firestone Multiseason 2
Rating: Satisfactory
23+22+
Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
Rating: Conditionally recommended
2+232-
Show test details
Autobild
Name WetDrySnowRolling resistanceWear
Best values in test2+1-2+11
Falken EuroALL Season AS210
Rating: Satisfactory
2+ 2232+
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
Rating: Satisfactory
3+2221
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Rating: Good
22223
Continental AllSeasonContact
Rating: Exemplary
222+ 2+2
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
Rating: Test winner
2+ 22+ 21-
Nexen N Blue 4 Season
Rating: Satisfactory
3+2-3+3+2+
Firestone Multiseason 2
Rating: Satisfactory
3+2-2+ 22
Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
Rating: Satisfactory
22+223+
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test37,650
Falken EuroALL Season AS21042,250,8
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S41,554,4
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H75040,352,3
Continental AllSeasonContact42,353
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-341,950,7
Nexen N Blue 4 Season4254
Firestone Multiseason 242,454,1
Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO41,452,9
Show test details
Autobild
Name WetDrySnow
Best values in test12+1
Falken EuroALL Season AS210
Rating: Good
22-2+
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
Rating: Satisfactory
22-3+
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Rating: Exemplary
1 22+
Continental AllSeasonContact
Rating: Satisfactory
22-1
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
Rating: Exemplary
2+21-
Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
Rating: Exemplary
1-2+ 2
Show test details
Autobild
Name WetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in test12+11
Falken EuroALL Season AS210
Rating: Exemplary
2221-
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
Rating: Satisfactory
222+3
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Rating: Good
1 2+ 2+3+
Continental AllSeasonContact
Rating: Exemplary
2+21-1-
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
Rating: Test winner
1-2+ 1-1
Nexen N Blue 4 Season
Rating: Good
222-2+
Firestone Multiseason 2
Rating: Good
22+ 2+1
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test39,745
Falken EuroALL Season AS21042,751,3
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S44,349,3
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H75041,147,2
Continental AllSeasonContact4348,6
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-341,647
Nexen N Blue 4 Season41,950,3
Firestone Multiseason 241,249,3
Show test details