Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO

Pros and cons

Exceptional handling on the wet
Great handling on dry roads
Short braking distance on wet roads

Performance Analysis: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO

This graph shows how the tyre ranks across different properties compared to other tested tyres. Higher percentile means better performance - 100% means better than every tyre in every test, 0% means worse than every tyre in every test.

50%

Wet braking

Wet circle cornering

Exterior noise

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Wet handling

Dry handling

Comfort

Aquaplaning - cross

Dry braking

•••

Loading comparison data...

Timeline

2018

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO was tested 4x (Autobild,...)

Sizes

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO is made in 10 sizes, starting from 185/60 R15 up to 225/50 R17.

15"

16"

17"

◀

▶

Filter:

XL 3
MFS 1

show prices

Similar tires

Blizzak LM-001 EVO

4.25/5

R15 - R17

Price from:

WinterContact TS 870

R14 - R18

4.95/5

Comparison with Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO:

Continental better at:

• Interior noise
• Snow handling
• Snow traction

Continental worse at:

• Wet braking

Price from:

Compare

UltraGrip Performance 3

R14 - R22

4.75/5

Comparison with Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO:

GoodYear better at:

• Snow traction
• Snow handling
• Interior noise

GoodYear worse at:

• Wet braking

Price from:

Compare

WINTER

R15 - R21

4.65/5

Comparison with Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO:

Dunlop better at:

• Snow traction
• Snow handling
• Comfort

Dunlop worse at:

• Aquaplaning - longitudal
• Wet circle cornering
• Dry handling

Price from:

Compare

Blizzak 6

R16 - R22

4.55/5

Comparison with Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO:

Bridgestone better at:

• Snow traction
• Snow handling
• Interior noise

Bridgestone worse at:

• Exterior noise
• Wet braking
• Wet circle cornering

Price from:

Compare

WinterCraft WP52+

R13 - R21

4.35/5

Comparison with Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO:

Kumho better at:

• Snow handling
• Dry braking
• Snow traction

Kumho worse at:

• Aquaplaning - cross
• Exterior noise
• Comfort

Price from:

Compare

Winter Sport 5

R14 - R21

4.3/5

Comparison with Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO:

Dunlop better at:

• Snow traction
• Interior noise
• Snow handling

Dunlop worse at:

• Exterior noise
• Wet braking
• Dry handling

Price from:

Compare

Alpin 7

R15 - R20

4.15/5

Comparison with Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO:

Michelin better at:

• Snow handling
• Snow traction
• Interior noise

Michelin worse at:

• Wet braking
• Wet circle cornering

Price from:

Compare

Polaris 6

R14 - R20

4.15/5

Comparison with Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO:

Barum better at:

• Snow traction
• Snow handling
• Comfort

Barum worse at:

• Wet braking
• Wet circle cornering
• Aquaplaning - longitudal

Price from:

Compare

POLARIS 6

R14 - R20

4.15/5

Comparison with Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO:

Barum better at:

• Snow traction
• Snow handling
• Comfort

Barum worse at:

• Wet braking
• Wet circle cornering
• Aquaplaning - longitudal

Price from:

Compare

Blizzak LM-005

R14 - R22

4.1/5

Comparison with Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO:

Bridgestone better at:

• Interior noise
• Snow traction
• Snow handling

Bridgestone worse at:

• Exterior noise

Price from:

Compare

W462 Winter i*cept RS3

R14 - R17

4.05/5

Comparison with Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO:

Hankook better at:

• Snow handling
• Snow traction
• Interior noise

Hankook worse at:

• Wet braking
• Exterior noise
• Wet circle cornering

Price from:

Compare

G-FORCE WINTER 2

R14 - R19

4.05/5

Comparison with Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO:

BFGoodrich better at:

• Snow traction
• Interior noise
• Snow handling

BFGoodrich worse at:

• Wet circle cornering
• Wet braking
• Dry handling

Price from:

Compare

Comparison: tyres similar to Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO